Why Is the Lag Time 60 Degrees Instead of 72 Degrees in Wave Phase Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a confusion regarding the calculation of phase difference in wave phase calculations, specifically why the lag time is stated as 60 degrees instead of 72 degrees. The user understands that the lag is described as 1/5 of a cycle of 360 degrees, which correctly equates to 60 degrees, but questions the logic behind this fraction. Despite attempts to clarify through diagrams, the user struggles with the math and seeks assistance before an upcoming exam. Responses suggest that the user may be overcomplicating the problem and encourage exploring additional examples to solidify understanding. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting phase relationships in wave calculations.
ishterz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I came across this question on waves which tells you how to calculate the phase difference and the lag time but I don' uderstand why it is 60 degrees.Although I'm notable to draw th diagram,I will write down the explination

What is the phase relationship b/w the two signals?(y1 and y2)

The difference between the squares of the signals on the graphs is 4 and one wavelenght of y2 is 20 squares.
So it says that the lag is 1/5 of a cycle of 360 degrees which is 60 degrees.

I understand where the 1/5th came from but how is it 60 and not 72 which is what you get after you divide 5 by 360? I thought the answer was wrong but similar questions have answers mismatched with mine as well.

So please help! I've got my exam tomorrow!

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
According to your description, I can't find any flaws in your solution. Especially if it says "the lag is 1/5 of a cycle of 360 degrees which is 60 degrees", there is probably a small math error. I can't be sure without the diagram though.

Can you try to post a picture?
 
I tried posting the picture up but it was unsuccessful. I've pretty much described it in the question though.
I don't understand,how is 60 1/5 of 360? isn't it 1/6th ? Why is it saying 1/5th ? =S
 
They probably just made a small mistake. Try some other examples and the concepts will become clearer. Don't get hung up on the same problem.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top