Why is the peak frequency of the Cosmic Microwave Background 160 GHz?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The peak frequency of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is debated, with calculations yielding results around 282 GHz using Wien's Displacement Law and frequency conversion. However, sources like HyperPhysics cite a peak frequency of approximately 160.4 GHz. The discrepancy arises from the definitions of power or intensity per unit wavelength versus per unit frequency, which affects the application of Wien's Law. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate interpretations of black body radiation and its measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Wien's Displacement Law
  • Understanding of frequency and wavelength conversions
  • Knowledge of black body radiation concepts
  • Familiarity with the Cosmic Microwave Background
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the applications of Wien's Displacement Law in astrophysics
  • Explore the differences between intensity definitions in black body radiation
  • Study the Cosmic Microwave Background's significance in cosmology
  • Learn about the methods for measuring peak frequencies in astrophysical phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students studying cosmology or black body radiation who seek to understand the complexities of the Cosmic Microwave Background and its peak frequency measurements.

Nim
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
What is the peak frequency of the Cosmic Microwave Background?

Using Wien's Displacement (#1) and then converting the wavelength of frequency (#2), I get 282 GHz.

#1. 0.0028977685 / 2.728 = 0.00106223185483871 Meters (1 millimeter)

#2. 299792458 / 0.00106223185483871 = 282228834161.183 Hertz (282 GHz)

This website seems to conclude that it's 160.4 GHz:
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2004/HeatherFriedberg.shtml

Also, if something isn't a perfect black body, is there an easy way to get a more accurate result? Using the surface temperature of the Sun (5785) I get about 500 nanometers, which is green I believe. I imagined I should have gotten a frequency closer to yellow, around 570 nanometers.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
I don't think this mismatch has actually something to do with anisotropies or deviations from the blackbody spectrum, but rather with the way that power or intensity are defined or measured per unit wavelength or per unit frequency. This leads to different forms of Wien's law and you have to check the definitions when you read about some "peak frequency". You can read about this here.
 
Last edited:
The hyperphysics website gave 160 GHz as an answer using the linear frequency equation. I just have to use a different constant. Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
13K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K