Why Is the Resultant Amplitude of Interfering Waves Not Simply A1 + A2?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 2K views
desmond iking
Messages
284
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



when a point is intefered by 2 waves of different phase , the resultant is y1 + y2 ... but why the resultant amplitude can't be = A1 + A2 ... but is sqrt root ((A1)^2 + (A2)^2) ??

this is actually a online note.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Attachments
  • ll'.png
    ll'.png
    19.6 KB · Views: 557
Physics news on Phys.org
desmond iking said:
when a point is intefered by 2 waves of different phase , the resultant is y1 + y2 ... but why the resultant amplitude can't be = A1 + A2 ... but is sqrt root ((A1)^2 + (A2)^2) ??
It isn't, and your pic shows it isn't. The peak of the resultant amplitude is determined using the cosine rule and the phase angle difference. Only if the phase angle was 90 degrees would your equation using Pythagoras hold.
 
NascentOxygen said:
It isn't, and your pic shows it isn't. The peak of the resultant amplitude is determined using the cosine rule and the phase angle difference. Only if the phase angle was 90 degrees would your equation using Pythagoras hold.

sorry, i mean why can't i add up A1 and A2 to get the resultant amplitude... tHat means resultant amplitude =A1+ A2
 
Because y1 and y2 never reach their maximum values at the same time. unless they're in phase (θ = 0).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person