Why is the Sky Blue? Understanding Rayleigh Scattering Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter kambez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sky
AI Thread Summary
The sky appears blue due to Rayleigh scattering, which is more effective at scattering shorter wavelengths of light, particularly blue, compared to longer wavelengths like red. This scattering occurs because the intensity of scattering is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength, meaning blue light is scattered much more than red light. As a result, blue light is visible from all areas of the sky, while direct sunlight appears white. The phenomenon is well-explained by the principles of light scattering in the atmosphere. Understanding Rayleigh scattering is essential for grasping why the sky has its characteristic color.
kambez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

Can anyone explain why sky is blue?

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Because the atmosphere is better at scattering blue light than light of other colors.

- Warren
 
Welcome to PF!

Hello kambez! Welcome to PF! :smile:

It's because scattering is inversely prooprotional to the fourth power of wavelength … see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering#Rayleigh_scattering_from_molecules"
The strong wavelength dependence of the scattering (~λ−4) means that blue light is scattered much more readily than red light. In the atmosphere, this results in blue wavelengths being scattered to a greater extent than longer (red) wavelengths, and so one sees blue light coming from all regions of the sky. Direct radiation (by definition) is coming directly from the Sun. Rayleigh scattering is a good approximation to the manner in which light scattering occurs within various media for which scattering particles have a small size parameter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top