Why is the Time Constant Used in Solving Inductance Problems?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the time constant (τ) in inductance problems, specifically in the context of a charging inductor equation. The user successfully solved part of the problem but is confused about the significance of setting t equal to τ in the equation. Clarification is provided that at t = 1.0τ, the exponential term simplifies to e^(-1), which is a standard practice in analyzing circuit behavior at specific time intervals. This approach helps in determining the current at that moment in the circuit. Ultimately, the user realizes their misunderstanding regarding the notation and its implications in the problem-solving process.
exitwound
Messages
291
Reaction score
1
This is not a homework problem, but practice. I have the answer. I need to know why.

Homework Statement



Capture.JPG


Homework Equations



i=\frac{E}{R}(1-e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}}) "charging" an Inductor

The Attempt at a Solution



I have solved part a) correctly.

i=\frac{E}{R}(1-e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}})
.8\frac{E}{R}=\frac{E}{R}(1-e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}})
.2 = e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}}
ln .2 = \frac{-t}{\tau}
t= 8.45\mu s

Part B is stumping me. I have a walkthrough of the problem but I don't understand why they do what they do. Here's the walkthrough.
At t = 1.0\tau, the current in the circuit is:
i=\frac{E}{R}(1-e^{-1.0})

Maybe I'm just missing something stupid, but how do they end up with -t/\tau= -1? If \tau is the time constant of the inductance (L/R), why do they "assume" or how do they calculate that t=1 and \tau=1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the problem and the example you have "at time t = 1.0*τ" so that is why
e^(t/τ) = e^(1.0*τ/τ) = e^1
 
Oh. I see. I think I was just misunderstood what they were saying. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top