Why is the W cross section so much larger than the Z cross section?

JoePhysicsNut
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I had a look at the production cross sections for W/Z at hadron colliders. These differ as a function of energy with the W x-sec being consistently ~10 times larger than the Z cross sections. Why is the W cross section so much larger? I think the coupling strength is similar and the mass difference is not that large either (~10%).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't fully understand the reasoning, but this paper gives the ratio as σWZ ≈ 3.33, and this book derives (Eq. 85) the ratio as

σWZ ~ |Vqq'|2/(vq2 + aq2)

where Vqq' ≈ 0.97 is the CKM matrix element and aq = 1/2 and vq ≈ -0.3 are the neutral current vector and axial vector couplings.

Which works out about right.
 
Last edited:
What you are probably looking at are not cross-sections but cross-sections times branching fractions.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top