Why is there a flux depression in CANDU fuel and how is it addressed in design?

AI Thread Summary
Flux depression in CANDU fuel arises due to the distribution of fissile material and the effects of neutron absorption, particularly in the inner fuel elements. The outermost ring of the fuel bundle typically generates more power due to higher enrichment and greater moderator volume, which enhances neutron moderation. As fuel undergoes irradiation, fissile inventory depletes, leading to increased power in outer elements as burnable poisons are consumed. The phenomenon is exacerbated by the absorption of thermal neutrons by fission products like Pu-239, further deepening the flux depression in the inner rings. Current CANDU designs aim to manage these effects through uniform enrichment and strategic placement of absorbers to mitigate safety concerns related to the coolant void coefficient.
sandon
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
let say there is an bundle of fuel with 4 rings. Where ring 1 is center most ring and ring 4 is outer most ring.

1st ring contains: 1 fuel element
2nd ring contains : 6 fuel elements
3rd ring contains: 12 fuel element
4th ring contains : 18 fuel elements

The general distribution of flux is that of a sinc function.

So why would 1 element in the outer most ring generate more power than the element in the inner most ring.

See attachment for (fuel element power) / (average fuel element power)
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    35.4 KB · Views: 592
Engineering news on Phys.org
That sounds like a CANDU element/assembly/bundle.

The inner rod may contain a lower enrichment or burnable poison, or conversely, the outer ring has a slightly greater enrichment.

During irradiation, the fissile inventory (e.g., U-235) is depleted, so enrichment and power decreases with burnup. In addition, if there is a burnable poison, e.g., Gd-155, 157, it will deplete during irradiation, and the power will gradually increase with burnup.

Furthermore, with irradiation, some of the U-238 is converted to Pu-239 through n-capture in U-238 followed by two successive beta decays, and Pu-239 is fissile.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
My guess would be the outer ring has more moderator volume. Similar to higher power pins next to guide tubes in PWR rectangular lattice fuel.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
1st ring contains: 1 fuel element
2nd ring contains : 6 fuel elements
3rd ring contains: 12 fuel element
4th ring contains : 18 fuel elements

This is CANDU 37-element fuel bundle with UO2 natural Uranium (0.71% U235). All elements in bundle has the same dimensions and composition. The CANFLEX bundle has 43 fuel elements, with two element sizes.The element in center contain poison (Dy).
Sure, the outer ring has more moderator volume (see CANDU lattice cell), i.e generate more power than the element in the inner most ring.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
QuantumPion said:
My guess would be the outer ring has more moderator volume. Similar to higher power pins next to guide tubes in PWR rectangular lattice fuel.
The outer ring could have slightly more moderation, depending on the clearance with the pressure tube.

I was also thinking that it could be surrounded by higher power bundles with slightly more enrichment.

But I suspect that the outer row might be more slightly enriched.

Newer bundle designs have more (43) rods.
 
In Candu fuel design this is a well known phenomena usually just called "flux depression" (a fairly generic term). Just think about the neutron current. The fuel produces large amounts of fast neutrons. Most of these leave the fuel channel, and are thermalized in the moderator. Most of the thermal neutrons eventually diffuse into the fuel channels to be absorbed in the fuel (some of which induce fission). As you move towards the center of the bundle, more of the neutrons have been absorbed by the outer layers and the thermal flux is depressed. Then there is a positive feedback effect, higher flux on the outer ring leads to faster accumulation of fission products and Pu-239. These isotopes absorb even more of the thermal neutrons increasing the depth of the flux depression.

@Astronuc,
Designs for bundles with absorbers or enrichment gradients usually try to increase the absorption at the centre of the fuel element (but not always). This can be to either decrease flux depression and/or to reduce the coolant void coefficient (which is slightly positive for CANDUs). A positive void coefficient is commonly brought up as a safety concern for CANDU designs, however as hypothetical accidents progress the negative temperature coefficient actually takes over. As far as I know, all CANDU fuel designs currently being used commercially use uniform enrichment.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
3K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Back
Top