Why is there a Half Cos(x) Term in the Fourier Series for Cos(x)?

Osmano
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm having some trouble completing a Fourier series question.

We have f(x)=Cos(x), for abs(x)≤π/2
f(x)=0, for π/2≤abs(x)≤π
period=2π

and then show that the Fourier series f(x) reads
http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/3424/84335314oi1.jpg
now I can get the 1/π and the sum, as an=
http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/1703/eq2hn6.jpg
and working through from there, the only part I'm having trouble with is the origin of the half cos(x) term. As far as I'm able to apply the Fourier series I don't see where it comes from. (Bn must equal 0 right?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you deduce, that the Bn are zero? The orthogonality relation between sin and cos only holds if you integrate from 0 to 2pi, but in this case you integrate only from 0 to pi/2.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top