Why is \(\theta = n(\tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}))\) in complex exponentials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gregg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Theta
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains the relationship between the angle \(\theta\) in complex exponentials and the formula \(\theta = n(\tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}))\). It highlights that when raising a complex number \(a + bi\) to the power of \(n\), both the magnitude and angle are affected, leading to the expression \((a + bi)^n = (\sqrt{(a)^2+(b)^2})^n(cos(n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a})) + isin(n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}))))\). The relationship between the angle and the exponent is clarified through examples, showing how the angle doubles when squaring the complex number. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of representing complex numbers in polar form, linking it to Euler's formula \(e^{i\theta}\) for simplification. Understanding these concepts is crucial for working with complex numbers in polar coordinates.
Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
| a + bi | = \sqrt{(a)^2+(b)^2}
\theta = tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a})

|(a + bi)^n| = (\sqrt{(a)^2+(b)^2})^n
\theta = n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}))

(a+bi) = (\sqrt{(a)^2+(b)^2})^n(cos(n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a})) + isin(n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}))))

Why is \theta = n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}) ? For example when I have

5 + i

\theta = tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{5}) = 0.1974...

(5+i)^2 = 25 + 10i -1

(5+i)^2 = 24 + 10i

\alpha = tan^{-1}(\frac{10}{24}) = 0.3948...

2(0.1974) =0.3948

Why is it that the exponent of the vector can be used to get the angle of the resultant by simply multiplying it with the tan function? Also in the first part of that:

(\sqrt{(a)^2+(b)^2})^n(cos(n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a})) + isin(n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}))))

Just to make sure, it is only

isin(n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}))))

and not simply

(\sqrt{(a)^2+(b)^2})^n(cos(n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a})) + sin(n(tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a}))))

because one of the components is complex?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
you are talk about putting complex numbers in "polar form". If you represent a+ bi as the point (a, b) in Cartesian coordinates and the polar form is (r, \theta) (That is, distance from (0,0) to (a,b) is r and the line from (0,0) to (a,b) is \theta, it is easy to see that a= rcos(\theta) and b= rsin(\theta) so that a+ bi= r (cos(\theta)+ i sin(\theta)). Then [/itex](a+bi)^2= r^2(cos^2(\theta)-sin^2(\theta)+ i(2sin(\theta)cos(\theta)))[/itex] and recognise that cos^2(\theta)- sin^2(\theta)= cos(2\theta) and [/itex]2cos(\theta)sin(\theta)= sin(2\theta)[/itex]. The more general formula follows from the identites for sin(\theta+ \phi) and cos(\theta+ \phi).

Even simpler is to note that cos(\theta)+ i sin(\theta)= e^{i\theta} so that (cos(\theta)+ i sin(\theta)^n= (e^{i\theta})^n= e^{ni\theta}.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top