Why Is Weight Expressed in Scientific Notation in Physics Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter YayPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Weight is expressed in scientific notation in physics to simplify the representation of large numbers, making calculations easier and clearer. In the example provided, the weight of a 65kg student is calculated as 637N, which is then rounded and expressed as 6.4 x 10^2N to reflect significant figures accurately. This notation is particularly useful for larger values, allowing for concise communication of results. The rounding to two significant figures aligns with the precision of the given mass. Understanding scientific notation and significant figures is essential for accurately interpreting and presenting physics problems.
YayPhysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey,
I'm taking physics as a learn-at-home kinda course to get into school for electrical. I had a question about some of the logic and reason behind what the book is showing me as it doesn't explain much. The example question they gave is as follows:

Determine the weight of a 65kg student on earth( g= 9.8m/s2 [down]).

Given - g= 9.8m/s2 [down]
m = 65kg

Required - Fg=?

Equation - Fg = mg

Solution - Fg = (65kg)(9.8ms2)
Fg = 637N
Fg = 6.4 x 102N

More or less I wanted to know why the 637N was broken up to 6.4 x 102 and how I would go about extrapolating this from every question I come across from now on.

Any info is appreciated, I am new to physics and suck at math in general...

p.s. the g's in the equation should have an arrow pointing to the right over them but I have no clue how to write that on this thing...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its just a convention man..more applicable for bigger numbers...like you can write 10000000 or 10^7 they would mean the same thing...its just for the ease of writing
 
YayPhysics said:
More or less I wanted to know why the 637N was broken up to 6.4 x 102 and how I would go about extrapolating this from every question I come across from now on.
They are just expressing the weight using scientific or exponential notation. (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_notation" ) Note that they rounded off the answer to 2 significant figures instead of 3, which is more realistic since you only have the mass to 2 significant figures.


p.s. the g's in the equation should have an arrow pointing to the right over them but I have no clue how to write that on this thing...
While the acceleration is a vector, which you could express using that arrow notation, g itself is just the quantity 9.8 m/s^2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top