Why Is Zero the Upper Limit in Escape Velocity Derivation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shaan_aragorn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Escape
AI Thread Summary
In the derivation of escape velocity, the acceleration of a satellite is expressed as -gR^2/r^2, where R is Earth's radius and r is the distance from its center. The integration of v dv is performed with the upper limit set at 0 and the lower limit at escape velocity (Ve), reflecting that the satellite's velocity approaches zero as it moves infinitely far from Earth. This approach signifies that at an infinite distance, the satellite's velocity effectively becomes negligible. The reasoning emphasizes that escape velocity is the minimum speed needed to ensure the satellite can move away from the planet indefinitely. Thus, the integration limits illustrate the transition from escape velocity to a state of rest at infinity.
shaan_aragorn
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
escape velocity derivation

The problem is thus:
The acceleration of a satellite is given by -gR^2/r^2 where R= radius of Earth and r = distance of satellite from center of the earth. Find escape velocity.

Now I have read the solution to this problem and in it the author at one point has integrated v dv = -gR^2/r^2 with the upper limit for vdv being 0 and the lower limit being Ve(Escape velocity).

Now my problem is, why is 0 the upper limit and Ve the lower limit if in magnitude Ve>0?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of it this way: the escape velocity is the bare minimum velocity needed to always move away from the planet, so you could say that "at infinity" (which is a strange concept, let's just say "very far away") the satelite's velocity is "zero" (really close to zero). Thus the satelite starts out near the Earth at the escape velocity Ve and ends up out at infinity with zero velocity.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top