I Why L=L（v^2) in inertial reference system?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation L=L(v^2) within the context of inertial reference systems and the Galilean principle of relativity. It emphasizes that the properties of space are consistent in both directions, suggesting that only the magnitude of velocity, |v|, is relevant. The relationship f(|v|)=f(√(v^2))=g(v^2) indicates that v^2 is the critical factor in this context. This understanding clarifies the role of velocity in the equation. Overall, the conversation highlights the significance of velocity magnitude in inertial frames.
Dr turtle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Why Landau pointed out that Lagrange function shall only be affected by v square in inertial reference system?
Why he said that beacause space's propertiy is the same in both direction, so L=L(v^2), or do I misunderstand him incorrectly?
btw this conclusion appears in somewhere like page 5 and its about Galilean principle of relativity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The direction should not matter, so only magnitude of velocity |v| should matter.
f(|v|)=f(\sqrt{v^2})=g(v^2)
So we can say only v^2 matters.
 
That's really helpful, lots of thanks
 

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Question about L(v^2) Notation in Landau & Lifshitz's Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Using reference frames for derivation of Lagrangian
Replies
25
Views
3K
Transformation law of momentum under Galilean transformation
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Reference frames in terms of homogenity/isotropy
Replies
18
Views
2K
I Can time be another basis vector under Galilean relativity?
3
Replies
146
Views
10K
I Galilean relativity in terms of homogeneity
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Understanding non-inertial reference frames in CM and SR.
Replies
2
Views
3K
What exactly is meant by potential energy in the Lagrangian?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Understanding Relativity of Simultaneity in Resnick, Part I
Replies
16
Views
2K
I About global inertial frames in GR
2
Replies
78
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top