Why oxygen, cannot act as a pi-donor while NO can?

  • Thread starter Thread starter queries
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Act Oxygen
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the roles of oxygen and nitric oxide (NO) as pi-donors and pi-acceptors in coordination chemistry. It clarifies that oxygen, despite having two pi* electrons, is generally not a pi-donor due to its high electronegativity, which makes it reluctant to donate electrons. In contrast, NO can act as a pi-donor, forming stable complexes with metals, such as nitrosyl species. The conversation also touches on the paramagnetic nature of molecular oxygen, which has unpaired electrons, and its ability to act as a d-acceptor, forming superoxo species. The rarity of dioxygenyl ions is noted, emphasizing the complexity of oxygen's behavior in bonding scenarios. Overall, while oxygen can theoretically act as a pi-donor, it is not common in practice due to its chemical properties.
queries
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I have learned that pi-donor are those ligands which donate their pi electrons to metal centre while pi-acceptor accepts electron from filled d(pi) orbital to their pi* orbital.
Now, I'm confused, why oxygen, having two pi* electrons cannot act as a pi-donor while NO, having one pi* electron only can?

Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes adf89812
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Have you actually been told that oxygen cannot act in this way, or is it more that you haven't seen any examples yet?
 
Actually my professor said so, but I just wonder why
 
What is a pi bond? Is it present in an oxygen atom?

What is a pi electron? How does it relate to a pi bond?

edit: It just occurred to me that you might be referring to molecular oxygen. If that is the case, you should know that oxygen is paramagnetic... that is, it has two unpaired electrons. Try to resolve that bit of information with the Lewis structure!
 
Last edited:
Oxygen can act as a pi-donor. It seldom does because oxygen is electronegative and simply doesn't like donating electrons in general, pi or otherwise.

NO can act as a pi donor because you can form a nitrosyl species, e.g. when binding to a metal atom:
M+..NO* <->M-NO+

The corresponding dioxygenyl ion for oxygen is very rare and very high in energy. OTOH oxygen can act as a d-acceptor, forming a superoxo-species. (pretty much all the oxygen-consuming reactions in biology are performed by metal centers in enzymes, e.g. cytochrome c oxidase.)

chemistree: You don't know what a pi bond is, or you're not using your head? Of course he's talking about molecular oxygen. And why bring up Lewis structures when the discussion is already phrased in terms of more sophisticated MO theory?
 
alxm said:
Oxygen can act as a pi-donor. It seldom does because oxygen is electronegative and simply doesn't like donating electrons in general, pi or otherwise.

Please name one. I'd be very interested to learn about it.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top