Why rocket altitude does not increase proportionally?

AI Thread Summary
Rocket altitude does not increase proportionally due to the conservation of energy principles, specifically relating gravitational and elastic potential energy. The mass of the rocket remains constant, but the spring constant (k) decreases as the rubber band stretches. This relationship indicates that as the rocket ascends, the energy transfer dynamics change, affecting altitude gain. The discussion highlights the need for clear communication of concepts, as visual aids can be crucial for understanding complex physics. Overall, the interplay of energy forms is central to understanding rocket altitude behavior.
Starnair
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
1. Why rocket altitude does not increase proportionally with the amount of rubber band stretch? Provide an explanation for the lack of direct correlation.
I'm not sure that I am doing in right way, and cannot understand why k value is decreasing as rubber band stretches because I thought k value never changes.
Relevant Equations
Es=Eg
Photo includes this.
I thought it is because of the consevation of the energy, so I used (gravitational potential energy at the top = elastic potential energy). Since the mass of the rocket never changes, I supposed mass= 1kg, and k value is unknown. As a result, I got the result that k value is decreasing as ruvber band stretches.
 

Attachments

  • 15600881792087086667835959235450.jpg
    15600881792087086667835959235450.jpg
    25.7 KB · Views: 260
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your attachment would be legible even if you had NOT posted it sideways. You should fix both of those issues and re-post it.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top