Why root mean square for temperature?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of root mean square (RMS) speed rather than mean speed to describe atomic temperatures. RMS speed is preferred because it accurately reflects the total kinetic energy of molecules, as represented by the equation E=n*(1/2)mv^2, where v is the RMS speed. Using average speed in this context would not yield correct results for kinetic energy calculations. The conversation also touches on the physical properties of atoms that make RMS speed a more suitable measure. Understanding these properties is key to grasping why RMS is more meaningful in thermodynamic contexts.
Galap
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
I was wondering why it is that when the temperature of something is being described, the root mean square speed of its atoms is used and not simply the mean speed. Why is the RMS more meaningful/useful when describing these things than the mean?

Thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
It's simply because the total kinetic energy of the molecules is given by E=n*(1/2)mv^2, where v is the RMS speed. That equation wouldn't work if v were the average speed.
 
ideasrule said:
It's simply because the total kinetic energy of the molecules is given by E=n*(1/2)mv^2, where v is the RMS speed. That equation wouldn't work if v were the average speed.

I guess the question would be better rephrased as: What physical properties of the atoms make it that v being the RMS work as opposed to the average?
 
Back
Top