Why the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra & Calculus are Called "Fundamental

  • Thread starter Thread starter trx123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental
AI Thread Summary
The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees that every non-constant polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root, addressing the essential question of whether solutions exist for polynomial equations. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus establishes that integration and differentiation are inverse operations, simplifying the computation of definite integrals. While the term "fundamental" may seem outdated in the context of modern algebra, it signifies the importance and general applicability of these theorems in mathematics. Both theorems are considered central to their respective fields, providing foundational principles that guide further study and application. Understanding these theorems is crucial for grasping core concepts in algebra and calculus.
trx123
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain why the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus are called "Fundamental"?
The algebra theorem states that every non-constant single-variable polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root.
The calculus theorem states that an indefinite integration can be reversed by a differentiation and that a definite integral of a function can be computed by using anyone of its infinitely many anti-derivatives.
According to Wikipedia, the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra is not fundamental for modern algebra; its name was given at a time in which algebra was basically about solving polynomial equations with real or complex coefficients. In any case, what's is fundamental about these theorems? This is a word useage question more than a math question.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well I think the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra is not fundamental to modern algebra since polynomials are more or less an elementary topic. Anyways, elementary algebra is all about solving equations. Linear equations and quadratic equations are introduced first, but these are only the tip of the iceberg. Polynomials are much more general, and finding solutions to polynomial equations are not always straightforward. There are many techniques, such as the factor theorem, root theorem, synthetic division, intermediate value theorem, etc., but you don't always know which ones will work. So then a very natural and important question is to ask whether we could even find a solution to any polynomial equation placed before us, and the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra answers that. Thus, while the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra does not always lend itself to practical use, it is a very general statement that guarantees solutions to a large set of the algebraic equations one encounters in elementary mathematics.

The fundamental theorem of calculus is extremely practical. The definition of the integral encountered in a calculus course is not always easy to work with. Finding the area under x^2 without the fundamental theorem of calculus, for instance, takes a bit of algebra and is prone to computational mistakes. This is however, considered a relatively nontrivial result (especially when Archimedes first used this method awhile back), because you can't really provide a geometric proof. But after Newton and Leibniz discovered the Fundamental Theorem, such integrals became much simpler. After their discovery, one simply had to take a derivative, and if the resulting function is continuous, then one obtains a formula for the antiderivative. This of course lead to widely used methods of integration, e.g. integration by parts or substitution.
 
  • Like
Likes japplepie
Thanks for writing. What I get from your answer is that a theorem may be called "fundamental" if it is a very general statement. Two of Merriam Webster definitions of the word fundamental are "of central importance" and "dealing with general principles rather than practical application." It is a ubiquitous word in Physics. In her book "Warped Passages," Lisa Randall uses the word many times.
 
Fundamental means the theorem is regarded as one of the most important in the field.

In the case of the fundamental theorem of algebra, you have to understand that algebra and abstract ("modern") algebra are two distinct subjects.

You put a lot of detail into your wording of the theorems. To see why they are fundamental, it is helpful to give a rough idea of what they mean:

FT of calc - Integrals and derivatives are inverse operations.
FT of algebra - All nontrivial polynomial equations have solutions.
FT of arithmetic - integers have unique factorizations.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top