Why the square-root of the metric

  • Thread starter Thread starter stevendaryl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
2,954
In a paper about field theory in curved spacetime, an author says that the Lagrangian density for a free scalar particle is

L = \sqrt{-g} ((\nabla_\mu \Phi)(\nabla^\mu \Phi) - m^2 \Phi^2)

Is there a simple explanation for why this is scaled by \sqrt{-g}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The simple explanation is the Lagrangian is a tensor density. You want to map a volume to a number (a Lorentz scalar), but representing the volume requires the factor of sqrt(g).

http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/genrel/ch04/ch04.html (Ben Crowell's online book) talks a little about tensor densities in an informal way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because the Lagrangian density is integrated over spacetime to obtain the action, and without the factor of \sqrt{-g}, the integral isn't invariant under a change of coordinate charts. [Edit: This is another way of saying what pervect said.]
 
Because \sqrt{-g}=det(J), where J is the Jacobian matrix transforming from Cartesian coordinates to the coordinates being used in the particular problem.

The volume element in a set of arbitrary coordinates is given by dV=det(J)dx1dx2...dxn. For example, in Cartesian coordinates in 3D space dV=dxdydz. The determinant of the Jacobian transforming to spherical coordinates is r2sinθ, so the volume element in spherical coordinates is dV=r2sinθdrdϕdθ.

You need the factor in front of dnx in order to keep things invariant under a coordinate transformation.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top