Why the term cylindrical functions for the states in LQG?

zwicky
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Why the term "cylindrical functions" for the states in LQG?

I just can't find a any reference that explain the why of the term "cylindrical" for the states in LQG. Thanks in advance for any comment.

Z.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


zwicky said:
I just can't find a any reference that explain the why of the term "cylindrical" for the states in LQG. Thanks in advance for any comment.

Z.
The term means different things in different contexts. The term "cylinder function" comes up in constructing measures on infinite dimensional vector spaces.

For example here is a reference to 1957 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/pmc/articles/PMC528446/?page=1

Kurt Friedrichs and Howard Shapiro
Integration over Hilbert Space and Outward Extensions.

The Hilbertspace H is infinite dimensional, and you want to be able to do integral calculus on it. You want to be able to integrate functions defined on the Hilbertspace.
You start with a simple set of functions. A function f is a cylinder function based on E, if there is a finite dimensional subspace E, of H, such that if PE is the projection of H down onto E, then for all x in H we have f(x) = f(PE x).

It is a beautifully simple idea, it means that the function f depends only on finite coordinates. You can project down which means throwing away all the other information and the function only depends on x thru its projection onto the subspace E.

I have to go. But Weiner measure on random walks and all kinds of stochastic process measures on various function spaces can be constructed this way.

It is a classic idea in topological vectorspaces.

I think they just took it over. I will check in later and clarify as needed.
===EDIT==
Checked in the next day.
Well maybe the analogy with what happens with cylinder functions in Loop is obvious. I don't see more questions. So maybe this explanation is OK.
 
Last edited:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
60
Views
7K
Back
Top