Why this solution to the 3D periodic Navier-Stokes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physical understanding of directionally stationary flows in the context of the 3D periodic Navier-Stokes equation. It raises the question of whether such flows, influenced solely by viscous damping and lacking external forces, would remain constant in direction while changing in magnitude. A clarification is made regarding terminology, suggesting the correct term should be 'incompressible' rather than 'incomprehensible.' The conversation highlights the complexities of fluid dynamics and the implications of Newton's Second Law on the behavior of these flows. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the need for clarity in discussing fluid mechanics concepts.
davidpurvance
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Who can provide a physical understanding to this solution to the 3D periodic Navier-Stokes equation: http://purvanced.wordpress.com?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Directionally Stationary Navier Stokes Flows

By Newton's Second Law, wouldn't incomprehensible Navier Stokes flows, devoid of any external forces, be directionally stationary? This is, flows changing in magnitude due to viscous damping, but not in direction?
 
I think you mean 'incompressible' flows, rather than 'incomprehensible' flows.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Back
Top