akb11 said:
Hi ,
Thanks for your reply. I went through Smith Chart and also tried a couple of impedance matching exercises. I have understood when to use a series L or C and when to use a parallel L or C.
So just to check if i have understood it right.
In RF circuits we use insertion voltage gain instead of the usual voltage gain. In low frequency circuits, the source voltage is always equal to voltage at the device (2 port network) input. In RF circuits, the voltage transfer from source to device input depends on the impedance match and in the best possible case ( i.e. reflection coefficient is 0 ) only half of the source voltage appears as device input voltage or half of the power is transferred from source to input (Maximum power transfer theorem).
Have I understood it correctly ?
Thanks for your help.
I was going to come back and stress some points relate to what you brought up here.
1) Gain in RF is hard to come by, mainly because the input impedance that people usually assumed to be high is not so in RF. This is because the parasitic capacitance pretty much dominates the input, the lead inductance of the bonding wire(s) also play a major role. That's the reason if you look at the S11 ( that show input impedance) plot on the Smith chart, it goes quite a bit below 50Ω. So you need power to drive the transistor/amplifier. You don't get gain like normal common emitter stage in low frequency. So...Power is expensive, you can't afford to lost efficiency due to mismatch.
2) We don't use voltage gain in RF because more voltage don't mean more power transfer. Remember W=IV. S parameters are power waves. We optimal power transfer, not voltage transfer like the low frequency circuits. If you study Phasor, you can see if you terminate with open circuit, you get max voltage, but you don't transfer power.
3) In low frequency circuit, the parasitic capacitance and inductance is negligible, so the parameters remain quite constant. But in RF, the parasitic dominates and they are frequency dependent. That's the reason you have a long list of S parameters for all frequency points.
4) Remember also the physical dimension. When the dimensions are comparable to the wave length ( λ/4), things behave very differently. In low frequency model, you assume the λ>>>physical dimension.
If you get rid of the parasitic and physical dimension limitations, the RF device is no different from the low frequency device. All the S parameters at different frequencies become constant and the low and high frequency model become the same. There is no mystery in this, RF parameters just take the parasitic and physical dimension into account.
I can't speak for mm wave stuff, but for a few GHz RF, there is no black magic, it's just taking into consideration of all the physical dimensions and parasitic parameters. Spend the time "dancing" on the Smith chart. I've seen RF engineers taking a short cut, relying on application circuits provided by manufacturers and blindly copy the circuit. That's the reason why application schematics become so important now a days.