Why wavelength matters in diffraction

AI Thread Summary
Wavelength plays a crucial role in diffraction, as significant diffraction occurs only when the wavelength is comparable to the size of the opening. For example, light can diffract through a small slit or pinhole, while larger openings, like doorways, result in minimal diffraction. The discussion highlights that when the wavelength is long relative to the opening, diffraction is pronounced, whereas a short wavelength leads to less noticeable diffraction effects. The impact of edges on light is also emphasized, with a rule-of-thumb indicating that openings about one wavelength wide are markedly affected. Overall, understanding the relationship between wavelength and opening size is essential for analyzing diffraction phenomena.
MIA6
Messages
231
Reaction score
0
Waves pass through a 10.-centimeter opening in a barrierr without being diffracted. This observation provides evidence that the wavelength of the waves is much shorter than 10. cm. This is a multiple-choice question, and this is not the question that I am asking. I want to use this as an example to ask that why wavelength matters in diffraction, like in slit problem. If the wavelength is long, then what happens? If it is short, then?
thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diffraction is only significant if the wavelength is similair to the size of the opening. So light diffracts through a pinhole or small slit, electrons diffract in a crystal, water waves diffract in a harbour.

But you don't significantly diffract when walking through a doorway!
 
mgb_phys said:
Diffraction is only significant if the wavelength is similair to the size of the opening.

But you don't significantly diffract when walking through a doorway!

But why?:blushing:
 
While the same amount of light is effected by the edges,
whether it is a 100 nm opening or a 100 mm opening,
the amount of light that is NOT effected is much greater
for the wider opening.
Rule-of-thumb says that "about 1 wavelength wide"
is *markedly* effected by a single sharp edge ...
so the fraction 2*600 [nm]/100,000,000 [nm] IS effected.
It takes _serious, careful_ work to notice 10 parts per million
(but it can be done ... just wait till next year!)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top