Why white blood cells and red blood cells are destroyed?

AI Thread Summary
White blood cells (WBCs) have varying lifespans depending on their type and function, with some designed to combat infections living only 20-30 hours. The death of WBCs is often due to apoptosis, a programmed cell death essential for maintaining immune balance. Red blood cells (RBCs) typically last around 100 days and are filtered through the spleen and liver for breakdown, not dying within the blood vessels. The liver processes these cells through specialized cells called Kupffer cells, which help in their degradation. Understanding these processes may require further study, such as a microbiology course, to grasp the complexities involved.
Aafia
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
Why do white blood cells die and what cause them to destroy within a few (20-30) hours?
I have an other question also that if red blood cells remain within capillaries, veins and arteries then how do they pass onto liver cells for the breakdown or they die within veins, capillaries and arteries?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
1. Are you asking about the mechanism of white cell death inmsome context? Have you looked up "apoptosis"?
2. Red cells... and anything else thst needs to be processed out: there isva filter system.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Simon Bridge said:
1. Are you asking about the mechanism of white cell death inmsome context? Have you looked up "apoptosis"?
2. Red cells... and anything else thst needs to be processed out: there isva filter system.
Basically I want to know what causes the death of RBC and WBC or what triggers this destruction. Is it necessary for these cells to die. Also, if RBC's and WBC's run within capillaries and arteries then why it is said that they are destroyed in liver and spleen? Does they pass into the liver cells through some opening in capillaries or they dies within these capillaries?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Red blood cells last ~100+ days in the body. Sometimes a lot longer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_blood_cell

White blood cells are NOT one kind of cell. There are several, and depending on what they do, they last for different times.
On average they last about one year. WB Cells that are created to fight an infection live for short periods of time; the example you gave was 20+ hours and that was probably about them.

On your next question - help us to help you: tell us where you read your information, or give us some context for your question. Thanks
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja
Aafia said:
Why do white blood cells die and what cause them to destroy within a few (20-30) hours?
I have an other question also that if red blood cells remain within capillaries, veins and arteries then how do they pass onto liver cells for the breakdown or they die within veins, capillaries and arteries?

A college microbiology course will help you understand this more in depth (you wouldn't have to ask these questions if you took it). Like Jim posted, your questions aren't specific enough- there are other processes that you need to understand firstly.

Until then, this video might help and addresses your questions; I find visualizing processes like this an important precursor to my own understanding:

 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top