Why would voltage stay the same when a dielectric is introduced?

AI Thread Summary
The introduction of a dielectric increases the capacitance of a capacitor, which is inversely related to voltage according to the equation Q=CV. However, when a dielectric is added, it affects all capacitors in the circuit, leading to a situation where the voltage across capacitor 3 remains constant. This is because the overall charge distribution and potential difference are maintained in the circuit. The dielectric's effect is uniform across the capacitors, ensuring that voltage does not decrease as initially expected. Understanding this relationship clarifies how dielectrics influence capacitance and voltage in a circuit.
okgo
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
http://www.screencast.com/users/trinhn812/folders/Jing/media/9527c4fa-05b4-4baa-98ee-2a3ad47e7e5a

I need an explanation for question 6. Why would voltage stay the same across capacitor 3?


The dielectric increases capacitance which is inversely related to voltage correct? The equation Q=CV says this. So shouldn't voltage decrease across capacitor 3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you get the voltage of C3 in the original set-up? How does the dielectric change all capacitance?

ehild
 
Yes the capacitance does increase but it does so for all three capacitors.Take another look at the question.


Hello ehild.You just beat me to it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top