Will a Ball or Newtonian Liquid Bounce Indefinitely in an Isolated Container?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amr Elsayed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
In an isolated container, a ball released will not bounce indefinitely due to energy loss from heat during collisions, contradicting the concept of perpetual motion. Similarly, a Newtonian liquid will also not bounce indefinitely, as it cannot transfer energy to the ground without generating heat. The principle of energy conservation applies, meaning that both scenarios will eventually result in a loss of motion. Discussions around perpetual motion are generally prohibited, emphasizing that such machines cannot exist. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding energy conservation in these contexts.
Amr Elsayed
Messages
90
Reaction score
3
Hi,
I want to make sure what is going to happen if I release ball to fall in an isolated container where no sound or heat is a production of collision. Would it keep going up and down without any change in height reached every single time ? what if I release a Newtonian liquid ? would it bounce too ? giving that liquid cannot transfer energy to ground , does this condition of isolated ground make no sense ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amr Elsayed said:
I release ball to fall in an isolated container where no sound or heat is a production of collision.
The container cannot prevent the ball from heating up during the collision.
Amr Elsayed said:
what if I release a Newtonian liquid ?
Same as above, you cannot prevent it from heating up.
 
  • Like
Likes Amr Elsayed
Energy is conserved. Perpetual motion machines do not exist. Using those principles, can you answer your own questions?

By the way, discussion of perpetual motion is forbidden on PF.
 
anorlunda said:
Energy is conserved. Perpetual motion machines do not exist. Using those principles, can you answer your own questions?
My own question is already answered in post #2

anorlunda said:
By the way, discussion of perpetual motion is forbidden on PF.
All I did talk about was conservation of energy. I don't know if it's forbidden or even why, if so I didn't know before posting, thanks for telling me
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top