Will a faraday cage stop gamma rays?

AI Thread Summary
A Faraday cage is ineffective against radiation from the Japanese reactor, as it primarily blocks radio and microwave frequencies, while X-rays and gamma rays can penetrate matter. To effectively stop high-energy electromagnetic radiation, materials with significant thickness and density, such as concrete and lead, are recommended. Lead is dense but can produce high-energy Compton recoil electrons, which may generate additional radiation. Pulsed DC current at the same frequency as the radiation does not provide a solution for stopping it. Therefore, conventional shielding materials are necessary for radiation protection in this context.
indio007
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Can a faraday cage be used to stop the radiation at the Japanese reactor? If not why not? I know the frequencty is high but what if you pulsed DC current at the same frequency would that stop it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
indio007 said:
Can a faraday cage be used to stop the radiation at the Japanese reactor? If not why not? I know the frequencty is high but what if you pulsed DC current at the same frequency would that stop it?
Faraday cages work on radio/microwaves. X-rays and gamma rays penetrate matter.

I suggest one determine the frequencies of 10 keV, 100 keV, 1 MeV photons.
 
When it comes to stopping high energy electromagnetic radiation there is little better than thickness and/or density - concrete and lead come to mind as suitable substances. Lead has the density but also produces high energy compton recoil electrons that can subsequently lose energy via Bremsstrahlung radiation.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top