Will closing the slit affect the clarity of observing light interference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Josielle Abdilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference Light
AI Thread Summary
Closing the slit affects the clarity of observing light interference by increasing diffraction, as the slit width approaches the wavelength of light. While the diffraction pattern remains unchanged, the intensity of light transmitted through the slit decreases, impacting the brightness perceived by the observer. Increased diffraction leads to a wider spread of light angles, which may complicate clarity. The overall effect on clarity depends on the balance between light intensity and diffraction. Further insights from optics experts could clarify these interactions.
Josielle Abdilla
Messages
50
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
If a student observes a slit illuminated by a light source, through a slit Sa which is almost closed what will he observe?
Relevant Equations
The answer to this question does not involve any mathematical equations but is mainly descriptive
My guesses are that if slit is almost closed, then the width is comparable to the wavelength and diffraction will occur. does this means that he will observe the slit S clearly or less clearly?

[Picture cleaned up a bit by a Mentor]

Light Interference Pic.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1587833973047261313699.jpg
    1587833973047261313699.jpg
    45.2 KB · Views: 146
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any ideas please?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am not entirely sure on this question, though there are a few things we can say with reasonable certainty.

Do you know what a double slit diffraction pattern looks like? Then, changing the width of ##S_a## does not affect that diffraction pattern, but it will change the amount of light that passes through ##S_a## and by extension the power transmitted through the second slit. If the eye being 'close' enough is to imply that all transmitted light will be detected by it somehow or another regardless of diffraction out of ##S_a##, then the obvious difference to me is the intensity on the retina.

However, the water is muddied by the fact that decreasing the width of ##S_a## also increases the amount of diffraction in that all of the angles to different points in the single slit diffraction pattern increase. I'm not sure if this is also meant to be taken into account.

Perhaps someone more knowledgeable with optics will comment later on!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Josielle Abdilla
Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top