Will Dropping a Cinder Block Really Only Destroy One Block?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Totaro17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
AI Thread Summary
Dropping a cinder block from any height will not only destroy itself but can also cause damage to other blocks depending on the height of the drop. The energy from the impact generates shock waves, which increase in intensity with greater drop heights, leading to more extensive damage. At minimal heights, such as 1 cm, the shock waves are small, resulting in negligible damage. As the drop height increases, the dropped block will consistently shatter, and damage will extend to the top block and potentially further down the stack. A precise model for predicting damage would require detailed information about the blocks' physical properties, making it a complex task.
Totaro17
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been debating somebody and he says that if you drop one cinderblock from ANY height(onto 9 other ones) it will only destroy one cinderblock because it destroys itself in the process.I believe the higher up you drop, more blocks will be destroyed. Can someone tell which is correct and(most importantly) WHY??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The faster the impact the greater amount of energy has to be dissipated on impact, so there will be a correspondingly greater amount of damage, primarily as a result of shock waves generated in the rigid and brittle blocks.
If you drop from just 1cm the shock waves will be small so there will be very little if any damage to any block.
As you increase the drop height damage will get more severe until the dropped block is destroyed every time, and you will begin to see increasing amount of damage occurring to the top block of the stack.
Eventually the impact energy will become great enough that the top block of the stack is also destroyed every time.
Increasing the impact energy still further would result in blocks further down in the stack taking damage too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Totaro17
rootone said:
The faster the impact the greater amount of energy has to be dissipated on impact, so there will be a correspondingly greater amount of damage, primarily as a result of shock waves generated in the rigid and brittle blocks.
If you drop from just 1cm the shock waves will be small so there will be very little if any damage to any block.
As you increase the drop height damage will get more severe until the dropped block is destroyed every time, and you will begin to see increasing amount of damage occurring to the top block of the stack.
Eventually the impact energy will become great enough that the top block of the stack is also destroyed every time.
Increasing the impact energy still further would result in blocks further down in the stack taking damage too.
rootone said:
The faster the impact the greater amount of energy has to be dissipated on impact, so there will be a correspondingly greater amount of damage, primarily as a result of shock waves generated in the rigid and brittle blocks.
If you drop from just 1cm the shock waves will be small so there will be very little if any damage to any block.
As you increase the drop height damage will get more severe until the dropped block is destroyed every time, and you will begin to see increasing amount of damage occurring to the top block of the stack.
Eventually the impact energy will become great enough that the top block of the stack is also destroyed every time.
Increasing the impact energy still further would result in blocks further down in the stack taking damage too.
Thank you so much for your reply! I said the same thing, almost verbatim to this person. He said I was wrong because of Newton's 3rd law. I told him that he misunderstands the law and there is more going on (1st and 2nd law, along with other physics). Can you possibly explain it in a more technical way( using equations and or modeling). Again THANK YOU!
 
To give a precise model of what would occur, so you could estimate for example the drop height at which the the first block breaks - that would require quite a lot of additional information about the exact composition of the blocks, their size, their density, elasticity (are they complete rigid or can they flex a small amount?), even their exact shape would be a factor, are the block surfaces completely smooth or not?, and probably more, it could quickly get very messy.

The main point is that the collision generates shock waves in a rigid material, and rigid materials tend to shatter in these circumstances.
Bigger shock waves at the point of impact will cause more damage at the impact site, and they also will travel further from the impact site with more potential to cause damage some distance away.

If you really do need a detailed accurate predictive model for some reason there are people on this site who would be better qualified to have a go at that than me, but it would be a considerable task to do so.
 
Last edited:
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top