Studying Will I be capable of self-studying for AP Physics C

AI Thread Summary
Self-studying for the AP Physics C exams is feasible for someone who is dually enrolled in high school and a state university, particularly if they have completed a basic algebra-based physics course and are taking Calculus II. While the individual is considering taking both subject tests, it may be more manageable to focus on one. Recommended textbooks include Halliday and Resnick, which are well-regarded for their comprehensive coverage, as well as Giancoli’s 4th edition, which is also suitable for AP preparation. Utilizing resources like MIT's open courseware can supplement self-study, especially in the absence of available university classes. Understanding calculus is crucial, as many physics problems require a solid grasp of mathematical concepts. Overall, with dedication and the right resources, passing the exams is achievable.
mrwall-e
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I will be dually enrolled at high school and a local state university next semester. I will be taking Calculus II, and have completed a basic algebra-based Physics course.

Will I be capable of self-studying for the AP Physics C (both subjects) exam in May?

Also, can you recommend any texts for learning the material? I've looked at Halliday and Resnick as per this forum's recommendations, but before I buy it I want to make sure it covers what I need.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me start off with the obvious answer “Only you know what you are capable of”. There, with that out of the way, yes it is very doable. I don’t think you mention which of the two Physics C exams you wish to take or whether it’s both. Either way it is very doable, and i think any good textbook can PRESENT you with more than enough information or material to do well if you in fact take it seriously. With that said, if you are still looking for books, i suggest you mention which subject test you’re planning on taking because obviously those large “cover all” textbooks are much more expensive than say a book that focuses only on E&M. So yes it is something that with a certain amount of dedication you can do and good luck.
 
Also, to my understanding this isn’t illegal so i’ll suggest this. Since you say you’re taking a class in you local state college, try and see if any first year mechanics or E&M courses are being offered close to the time you are attending your calc class. If there is any, i suggest you attend lecture even though you are not enrolled, therefore you have an actual lecturer presenting the material to you. If you keep up with the class, you’ll be more than ready to pass those exams come May. It’s just an extra hour of your time, which can save you time in the long run (since imo you’re MORE LIKELY to understand the material if someone is teaching it to you, hence why most of us go to school instead of self study) Either way though, i’d say most people are capable of passing that test with a little discipline.
 
chente12 said:
Also, to my understanding this isn’t illegal so i’ll suggest this. Since you say you’re taking a class in you local state college, try and see if any first year mechanics or E&M courses are being offered close to the time you are attending your calc class. If there is any, i suggest you attend lecture even though you are not enrolled, therefore you have an actual lecturer presenting the material to you. If you keep up with the class, you’ll be more than ready to pass those exams come May. It’s just an extra hour of your time, which can save you time in the long run (since imo you’re MORE LIKELY to understand the material if someone is teaching it to you, hence why most of us go to school instead of self study) Either way though, i’d say most people are capable of passing that test with a little discipline.

Unfortunately, if there was a class available - I would take it. The university isn't very big on physics, and there isn't a class available this semester.

I was planning on taking both subject tests, but perhaps that's a little bit too much? If I were to take both, can you recommend a book that would cover all of the necessary material?

Thanks for the response.
 
I definitely could recommend a book but i’m a second year undergrad so take it with a grain of salt. The book we use at our university for physics majors is by Giancoli (4th edition). It covers much much more than needed to do well in the ap exam. For electricity and magnetism I used Giancoli and the book “fundamentals of Electricity and Magnetism” by Arthur Kip. Both were good, but if people are recommending Halliday and Resnick i would probably go with that one. I’ve never read that book but i can safely say that given the good reviews and a quick look at the table of contents, that should you choose to buy that book, it will provide you with more than enough material to pass the tests. Personally i would suggest you choose one test to take, but ultimately it is up to you. Like i said, i can only go by what i know and considering i’m a second year, i know very little. Hopefully other people who are more knowledgeable in the subject (as most everyone in this forum is) can guide you toward the right direction. I just thought i would stick my finger in the subject. Even so, if you choose to go with Giancoli, you’ll be just fine. I’ve read reviews that say the book is too difficult but imo it is very fair. The problems are not very difficult but there will be some head scratchers. I suggest doing those and asking for help on this forum if you ever get stuck. There are plenty of smart people who would guide you in the correct direction. I’m also going to suggest you use MIT’s open courseware given that you won’t be taking any classes. That is the next best thing to attending lecture. Make sure though that you understand intro calc fairly well, because i’ve noticed most bad reviews of books are from people saying the math is too hard. These books being recommended are basically pure calculus so make sure you understand that.
 
chente12 said:
I definitely could recommend a book but i*m a second year undergrad so take it with a grain of salt. The book we use at our university for physics majors is by Giancoli (4th edition). It covers much much more than needed to do well in the ap exam. For electricity and magnetism I used Giancoli and the book *fundamentals of Electricity and Magnetism* by Arthur Kip. Both were good, but if people are recommending Halliday and Resnick i would probably go with that one. I*ve never read that book but i can safely say that given the good reviews and a quick look at the table of contents, that should you choose to buy that book, it will provide you with more than enough material to pass the tests. Personally i would suggest you choose one test to take, but ultimately it is up to you. Like i said, i can only go by what i know and considering i*m a second year, i know very little. Hopefully other people who are more knowledgeable in the subject (as most everyone in this forum is) can guide you toward the right direction. I just thought i would stick my finger in the subject. Even so, if you choose to go with Giancoli, you*ll be just fine. I*ve read reviews that say the book is too difficult but imo it is very fair. The problems are not very difficult but there will be some head scratchers. I suggest doing those and asking for help on this forum if you ever get stuck. There are plenty of smart people who would guide you in the correct direction. I*m also going to suggest you use MIT*s open courseware given that you won*t be taking any classes. That is the next best thing to attending lecture. Make sure though that you understand intro calc fairly well, because i*ve noticed most bad reviews of books are from people saying the math is too hard. These books being recommended are basically pure calculus so make sure you understand that.

Thanks, I will definitely look into Giancoli's book. I will also look at MIT's lecture series. I think we used a Giancoli book for my algebra-based class, and I think it was okay.

Thanks for the help.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top