Will Natural Gas Prices Soar This Winter?

  • Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Stupid
In summary, the article is about how fuel prices are going up and might go up more. He predicts that prices will go down when the reality of the cold weather sets in.
  • #1
russ_watters
Mentor
23,512
10,833
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-12-01-nat-gas-usat_x.htm

To be fair, the article isn't terrible, but it does have several "duhs" in it. The headline on the main page, though, is rediculous:
Natural Gas Prices Rise: Heating Bills Could Skyrocket This Winter
First, the obvious: fuel prices follow very regular cyclical patterns during the year. [edit: strangely, they cycle higher in the summer than the winter according to the DOE - I'll have to look into that more]. So what does that headline really mean? Well...
Natural gas prices are soaring on commodity markets, a development that could lead to higher-than-expected heating bills this winter...

"Consumer bills should be significantly lower this year than last year" even with the recent increase, he says.
In other words, the only actual news is that is being reported is that there has been an unexpected (unexpected by whom, it doesn't say) spike in prices recently, but prices are/will still be lower than last year.

Now for some "duhs"
Natural gas prices trading for delivery in January rose 11% in November and are trading near a 10-month high.
Natural gas price futures for January are higher the closer to January we get? Duh. Homer Simpson held on to his pumpkin company stock too long too...
Much of the gain has come in the last week. The reason: Cold weather is sweeping across the USA, leading to increased demand and, thus, higher prices.
A quick shock of cold weather causes the fuel futures prices to spike?!? You're kidding! :rolleyes:

Here's a prediction, though - sort of like Homer Simpson, who didn't consider how Halloween would affect his pumkin prices until after it happened, the market got spooked by the first quick shock of cold weather and the increases will slow as reality (real weather, real supply and demand) kicks in.
"It's cold, and it's cold across a large swath of the country. So demand is up," says Rusty Braziel, managing director of Bentek Energy in Golden, Colo.
Duh. Wait, I have a prediction - it'll be colder in a month. Where's my Pulitzer?!
Heating oil users, however, are expected to pay a little bit more as an expected increase in usage is projected to outweigh a decline in prices.
That one isn't a duh, it is just a head-scratcher.
 

Attachments

  • gas.jpg
    gas.jpg
    56.1 KB · Views: 382
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
:smile: You mean if someone uses heating oil, they'll have a bigger bill if they use more to heat their house?! Well, smack me with a fish, I'd have never figured that out on my own! :biggrin: (We really need a smiley that effectively conveys sarcasm.)
 
  • #3
russ_watters said:
To be fair, the article isn't terrible, but it does have several "duhs" in it. The headline on the main page, though, is rediculous: First, the obvious: fuel prices follow very regular cyclical patterns during the year. [edit: strangely, they cycle higher in the summer than the winter according to the DOE - I'll have to look into that more]. So what does that headline really mean? Well... In other words, the only actual news is that is being reported is that there has been an unexpected (unexpected by whom, it doesn't say) spike in prices recently, but prices are/will still be lower than last year.

Now for some "duhs" Natural gas price futures for January are higher the closer to January we get? Duh. Homer Simpson held on to his pumpkin company stock too long too... A quick shock of cold weather causes the fuel futures prices to spike?!? You're kidding! :rolleyes:

Here's a prediction, though - sort of like Homer Simpson, who didn't consider how Halloween would affect his pumkin prices until after it happened, the market got spooked by the first quick shock of cold weather and the increases will slow as reality (real weather, real supply and demand) kicks in. Duh. Wait, I have a prediction - it'll be colder in a month. Where's my Pulitzer?! That one isn't a duh, it is just a head-scratcher.
That's why I stay away from mainstream media - like CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, . . .

And I'm leary of newspapers like usatoday, NY Times, . . . . They have a penchant of stating (and often its restating from other news sources) the exceedingly obvious. I've also noticed that some stories in NY Times recently look a lot like stories I've read on the BBC. Arrggghhh.

There is a lot of volatility in the energy sector at the moment, especially after Katrina (Gulf supply of natural gas and oil) and since the invasion of Iraq, and the supply controls by OPEC (who want higher prices).

Gasoline prices may spike on distribution and crude oil prices, and problems with supply and refinery issues. Many states get special formulations which require special processing - which raises the cost - and formualtions differ between summer and winter.
 

FAQ: Will Natural Gas Prices Soar This Winter?

What is the purpose of studying "More Stupid Reporters"?

The purpose of studying "More Stupid Reporters" is to analyze and understand the behaviors and actions of reporters in various situations, in order to identify common mistakes and improve the overall quality of journalism.

How is "More Stupid Reporters" research conducted?

"More Stupid Reporters" research is typically conducted by observing and analyzing real-life interactions between reporters and subjects, or by conducting surveys and interviews with reporters themselves.

What can we learn from studying "More Stupid Reporters"?

By studying "More Stupid Reporters", we can learn about the common pitfalls and mistakes that reporters make, and how to avoid them in order to produce more accurate and ethical journalism. It can also shed light on the impact of media on society and how reporters can better serve their audience.

Is the term "More Stupid Reporters" derogatory?

The term "More Stupid Reporters" is not intended to be derogatory towards reporters, but rather to highlight the mistakes and shortcomings that can occur in the fast-paced and high-pressure field of journalism. It is important to approach this research with a constructive and objective mindset, rather than a judgmental one.

How can the findings from "More Stupid Reporters" research be applied in the real world?

The findings from "More Stupid Reporters" research can be applied in various ways, such as providing training and education for aspiring reporters, creating guidelines for ethical journalism, and increasing awareness of the impact of media on society. Ultimately, the goal is to improve the overall quality of reporting and promote responsible journalism.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top