Will switching to a lower resistance resistor damage my coil on long trips?

  • Thread starter Charlie Cheap
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Coil
In summary: I would like it to go as long as possible.In summary, the author is looking to replace their 1.4 ohm resistor with a .8 ohm resistor to increase spark at the plugs without damaging the breaker points. He is also concerned about the voltage backwash in the primary. He recommends using a .8 ohm resistor and a condenser to ease damage to the points.
  • #1
Charlie Cheap
76
16
TL;DR Summary
I have been tinkering with my 65 Ford Mustang six ignition. With an ACCEL coil rated at 1.4 ohms and a .8 ohms ignition resistor, will I damage the coil? After driving about 30 miles I checked the coil for overheating and it seemed normal (basic engine heat) and the car ran fine. I run a Pertronix in the dizzy with 8.8 mm wire wound resistance wires feeding Autolite platinum plugs gapped at .038. Timing is 12 degrees with vacuum shut off and dwell is 38 degrees.
I have stated here before I run a points distributor in my 200 Ford six but usually with a Pertronix conversion. After finding a later 200 head (1973) I plan to have it machined for a direct fit 2-barrel carb. Now I am using a 2-barrel adaptor and I want as much spark as possible at the plugs without hurting the basic Kettering system. I understand ignitions fairly well but at 75 and after a stroke a few years back, I sometimes doubt my thinking. The wife of 53 years makes remarks about my thinking before the stroke and believes I have not changed one bit! Anyway, going from a 1.4 ohm to a less resistance .8 ohm resistor (little more primary volts to coil) am I asking for trouble? We travel fairly long distances in the Mustang and I keep a coil, points, cond., in the glovebox...just in case. Should I keep a 1.4 ohms resistor also? The coil having a 100 to 1 ratio and the plugs set at .038 or maybe .040" am I okay? It works on short trips around town but we plan long trips and that is my concern. This is the engine and the LH-6 stands for Long Haul 6-Cylinder. THANKS ahead.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1743.JPG
    IMG_1743.JPG
    125.2 KB · Views: 248
  • IMG_1947.JPG
    IMG_1947.JPG
    105.1 KB · Views: 269
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Being an old Mopar guy I am often asked about Mopar ignition systems and whether or not the ballast resistor is a necessary item. All cars produced with breaker-points type ignition generally had a resistor of some sort in their ignition system. Some brands utilized a resistor in the coil or a resistor wire hidden in the wiring from the ignition switch, but Mopar put their resistor (or ballast resistor) on the firewall. The ballast resistor in a Mopar limits the amperage, or current flow, through the coil while the engine is running, thereby extending the life of the coil and breaker points of the distributor. When the ignition key is in the start position, full current is applied to the coil and increases voltage to the spark plugs. In fact you are shooting 14 Volts to the coil at start up and if you do not have the resistor you will fry t he points a lot quicker.

Chryslers electronic ignition systems used a dual ballast resistor, again to extend coil life and provide a constant primary current. Again the system also bypassed the resistor to apply full amperage to the coil during startup. In either type of ignition system, points or electronic, the ballast resistor can be removed to increase secondary voltage to the spark plugs, but the long-term effects of removing the resistor differ between the two systems.

An ignition system with breaker points will suffer from reduced point life if the ballast resistor is removed, as higher amperage can damage the surface of the points causing failure. Additionally, if the ignition is left in the run position and the points happen to be open-or worse, barely open-electrical arcs can cause raised spots on the points resulting in a change in dwell timing or an engine that won’t run at all.

Electronic ignition systems, whether factory Mopar or aftermarket, don’t utilize breaker points, thereby not actually needing a ballast resistor to control amperage through the pickup coil. And while ignition coil life may be compromised without a resistor, the additional secondary voltage (at the spark plug) is increased which generally improves power. So does your application require a ballast resistor? Quite simply, if your distributor has breaker points the answer is yes; if not, the answer is no. Run the lower amp resistor and you will be fine.

Trivia fact. EDM machines or Electrical Discharge Machine was invented by a couple of Russians that sealed up a distributor cap and filled it with oil to increase the points life. It did just the opposite and thus the EDM machine was born.
 
  • #3
Ranger Mike, thanks for the input. My Dad was also a MOPAR fan and his 55 Dodge Coronet with Red Ram V8 had dual points, so I learned about points function at an early age. For several years I had a 98 Ram pickup and liked it. I guess my concern is the lower resistance in the primary possibly hurting the coil or points. My Fluke reads just under 11 volts while running. The points condenser is the best I can find, so easing damage to the points is maybe okay...but my stroke seems to have left a blank spot in some of my electronics memory. More volts in the primary equals more output, but with a small backwash of voltage (my term) in the primary, might hurt the points with an arch...thus the reason for best condenser. With 2.83 rear gears, 26.3" tall tires, and a 2-barrel carb, my Mustang will probably never see 5,500 RPM, so hi-revving is not my goal, but dependability is, with a clean running engine. Thanks again for easing my mind about my modified old points ignition.
 

1. Will switching to a lower resistance resistor damage my coil on long trips?

It is possible that switching to a lower resistance resistor could damage your coil on long trips. This is because a lower resistance means more current will flow through the coil, which could lead to overheating and potentially damaging the coil.

2. How can I determine the appropriate resistance for my coil?

The appropriate resistance for your coil will depend on several factors, such as the type of coil, the power source, and the desired output. It is best to consult with a knowledgeable expert or refer to the manufacturer's specifications for guidance.

3. Can using a lower resistance resistor improve the performance of my coil?

In some cases, using a lower resistance resistor can improve the performance of a coil by allowing more current to flow through it. However, this should only be done with caution and proper knowledge, as it can also lead to damage if not done correctly.

4. Are there any safety precautions I should take when switching to a lower resistance resistor?

Yes, there are several safety precautions that should be taken when switching to a lower resistance resistor. These include ensuring the resistor is properly rated for the current and voltage of your circuit, using proper insulation and heat dissipation techniques, and monitoring the temperature of the coil during use.

5. Are there any alternatives to using a lower resistance resistor to improve coil performance?

Yes, there are several alternatives to using a lower resistance resistor, such as using a different type of coil or adjusting the power source. It is important to carefully consider all options and consult with an expert before making any changes to your circuit.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
2
Views
227
  • Electrical Engineering
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
32K
Back
Top