Will the frame be inertial if no forces act on it?

AI Thread Summary
A frame of reference constructed around an object far from external forces is generally considered inertial, as no forces imply no acceleration. However, if the object is rotating with constant angular speed, it introduces centripetal acceleration, making the frame non-inertial. An example provided is a spinning ball; even without external forces, its rotation affects the frame's inertial status. Internal stress fields do not negate this effect. Thus, the nature of the frame depends on the object's motion, not just the absence of external forces.
vissh
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hello :)
An object is placed far away from all the bodies that can exert force on it. A frame of reference is constructed by taking the origin and axes fixed in this object. Will the frame be necessarily inertial?

Hmm According to me, it should be an Inertial frame as No force acting on it and thus, no acceleration.
What do you think ^.^
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vissh said:
Hello :)
An object is placed far away from all the bodies that can exert force on it. A frame of reference is constructed by taking the origin and axes fixed in this object. Will the frame be necessarily inertial?

Hmm According to me, it should be an Inertial frame as No force acting on it and thus, no acceleration.
What do you think ^.^
Suppose that the object in question is rotating with constant angular speed?
 
Thanks for reply :)
Hootenanny said:
Suppose that the object in question is rotating with constant angular speed?
Hmmm yep in that case it will get acceleration towards center. But i can't think of an object whose internal forces can make that object Rotate about the object's axis. Can you give me an example or two (^.^)
 
vissh said:
Thanks for reply :)

Hmmm yep in that case it will get acceleration towards center. But i can't think of an object whose internal forces can make that object Rotate about the object's axis. Can you give me an example or two (^.^)
There needn't be any forces making the object rotate. Of course, the object will have some internal stress field, but that isn't important. Suppose you take a ball that is spinning with constant angular speed about its own axis in the absence of any external forces. This example satisfies the conditions in the question. If you were to associate a coordinate system with the ball such that it's origin in at the centre of the ball, the frame would necessarily be non-inertial since it is rotating.
 
:O Got it :)
Thanks nanny ^.^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
3K
Back
Top