Will using Griffith and Purcell benefit a beginner in E&M?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mk9898
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Griffith Purcell
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around selecting appropriate textbooks for a first-year Electricity and Magnetism (E&M) course. The original poster expresses frustration with the verbosity and simplistic exercises in "University Physics" by Young et al. and Serway, while acknowledging that these texts have aided in understanding some concepts. They are considering whether to use more advanced texts like Purcell and Griffiths, despite being a beginner in the subject. Participants note that while Purcell is suitable for first-year students at some institutions, Griffiths is typically reserved for upper-level courses. They emphasize that both Purcell and Griffiths contain challenging problems that can significantly enhance understanding of E&M, with Purcell being particularly beneficial for mastering the subject. Suggestions for additional resources include the Feynman Lectures on Physics and "Fundamentals of Electricity and Magnetism" by Kip, indicating a preference for texts that provide a deeper understanding without excessive verbosity.
mk9898
Messages
109
Reaction score
9
Hello,

I've been researching textbooks to use for my first-year E&M course and since I have no previous knowledge of E&M, I've been reading University Physics by Young et al. and Serway's book. I am pretty annoyed at the verbosity of the texts and the banal exercises where most exercises are just plug-ins. On the other hand they have helped me understand some concepts but they just take too long to get to the point as if the reader is slow to understand.

The level of the E&M course is very high for a second semester which is also why I am stressing to keep up. My math is good enough I believe for Purcell and Griffith but I am curious if you think that a essentially beginner in the subject would profit from working with both books?

How are the exercises in the two texts? Are they challenging and beneficial to do? Meaning, after doing the problems should I be able to master the subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For Purcell, definitely yes, if you can do the problems, you have the subject at a very high level. First year classical physics misses out the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms, so you will still have to learn that in later years. I'm not so familiar with the problems in Griffiths, but from the few I have done, I should think they are also well worth working through.
 
I don't understand, your course is very challenging, and you're struggling to keep up, so why are you looking for a more advanced book?

Either way, Do Purcell, Griffths is usually used for an intermediate E+M course.
 
Last edited:
mk9898 said:
I've been reading University Physics by Young et al. and Serway's book
Those are typical of the textbooks used for introductory physics in the US, except at some elite universities. Griffiths is typically used in upper-level undergraduate courses, usually 3rd or 4th year. Purcell's level is in-between, and IIRC it is in fact used as a first-year book at some schools. I seem to remember MIT uses it, but I'm not sure about it.

So if you want a more advanced book as a supplement, I would suggest Purcell rather than Griffiths. You might also try the Feynman Lectures on Physics which can be read online for free.
 
I would try Kip: Fundamentals of Electricity and Magnetism.

Alonso and Finn: Fundamental University Physics volume 2.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top