Program sets such as 'OneDrive', and 'Windows Update', and lots of other stuff, are disabled on all of my machines that run any versions of Windows. If I want to store something at a remote location, I'll explicitly transmit it to the remote location. I don't really hate Windows, but I do really hate the presumptuous paternalism of MS. No, it's not the OS provider's or any other program provider's machine; it's my machine. Don't try to make my machine do what you want in preference to doing what I want.
On any and all of my computing machines, I positively want, not merely would like, programs to not jump in helpfully when I haven't requested help, unless all indications are that I might be doing something destructive or something else that might matter that I maybe didn't really want to do. If I issue a command to destroy something permanently, I don't get annoyed at the "Are you sure?", but I hate it when, for example, I'm trying to correct a typo in an SMS message on my phone before I send the message, and the phone tries to make me select from a list of suggested corrections instead of just putting the cursor where I by-touch-indicated that I want it, so I can retype things myself.
I hate anything running on my machine that over-rides something I specified explicitly with something that some other programmer thought was implicit, or that some marketer thought I should want, or that someone wants me to put up with because he thinks it might benefit his group of beneficiaries.
I want my machine to do exactly and only what I command it to do. I'm preferentially an imperative language programmer; machine instructions are close enough for me to what the machine actually does; beyond the assembler, and a few imperative high level languages, and some obedient scripting languages, to me that other stuff is obfuscation. Maybe that's a bias left over from the days when computers did all and only what the user directed them do; not instead what someone who, presumably, presumed himself to be smarter than the user, thought the user must have meant. Perhaps that's because 'back in the day' the user and the programmer were apt to be one and the same.