Wing Commander Physics and Bernoulli's Principle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the physics in the movie "Wing Commander," specifically a scene involving cargo bay depressurization. Participants explore how Bernoulli's Principle applies to the scenario, where a small tear in the cargo bay allows air to escape into space. A simplified version of Bernoulli's equation is provided to estimate the velocity of the air exiting the orifice, leading to a calculated speed of approximately 450 m/s. The conversation also touches on real-life spacecraft pressure levels and potential complications such as flow choking at the orifice. Overall, the thread emphasizes the application of basic fluid dynamics principles to critique the film's portrayal of physics.
Bigwillyd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
"Wing Commander Physics" and Bernoulli's Principle?

Hey guys, I was wondering if you could lend me a hand on how to deal with a particular situation I have. I have an assignment regarding bad physics in movies, and the movie I chose is really an easy one to bash: "Wing Commander" (1999). If any of you have seen it, it's a real joke. So far I've it's been more than easy to mathematically disprove the movie's horrible physics, but the "cargo bay depressurization" scene is rather tricky.

If you havn't seen the movie, I'll bring you up to speed on this particular scene: A small tear opens up in one of the ship's cargo bay's bulkheads and naturally as Bernoulli's Principle states the air inside the cargo bay is blown out into space through the hole at very high speeds as the two pressure systems try to balance out. What I'm trying to find out here, is a very rough appriximation of the velocity of air being blown out of the oriface.

I've gathered the givens which I believe are needed:
Pressure in space = 0 (approximately)
Pressure inside the cargo bay= 101325 Pascals (atm)
Density of air inside the cargo bay = 1.2 kg/m^3 (average density at 20 deg. C in Earth atmosphere)
Velocity of air flowing out of the oriface = ?

Ultimately what I need here is a very rough equation which will allow me to get velocity. If any of you guys can help me tackle this bad boy, a link to another thread where this situation has already been discussed, or maybe even just a URL on how to solve this myself, I would be very appreciative. Again, all I need is a simple equation to give me a very rough approximation; no integrals please!

Thanks again, -Willy
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The is a basic Fluids 101 question. The answer is that you can apply a simplified version of Bernoulli's equation equating the static pressure in the ship (real spaceships aren't pressurized to 1 atm, but that's ok for your scenario) to the velocity pressure of the air in the orifice. So then Bernoulli's equation reduces to:

p=1/2 Rho * V^2

Rho is the density of the air. Btw, this is the real equation. Simple enough for ya!? :cool:

[edit] If you care about possible complications, you can say that in an orifice, there is a certain efficiency and loss due to the sides of the orifice not being optimized for good flow. But if the orifice is large enough, the air in the middle, at the very least, will follow Bernoulli's equation almost exactly.
 
You can complicate it further by the fact that the delta P across the orifice is more than enough so the flow would most likely be choked at the orifice.
 
Is it? Huh, I thought of that but didn't do the calculation so I didn't realize it was that high. (click-click-click) Yeah, how 'bout that! Not too much over, though.

Also, I just checked and the space shuttle and ISS run at atmospheric pressure, but reduce to 10.2psi for a day before spacewalks to avoid the bends. Reading further, the Apollo craft operated at 2 psi and 100% oxygen (after Apollo 1, it switched during ascent from an oxygen/nitrogen mixture at sea level pressure). Gemini used 5.2 psi.
 
russ_watters said:
Also, I just checked and the space shuttle and ISS run at atmospheric pressure, but reduce to 10.2psi for a day before spacewalks to avoid the bends.

So, when they reduce to 10 psi, where does the extra air go? Because presumably, they would want to re-pressurize again later...
 
Thanks for the equation Russ. I plugged everything in and got a big number for speed like 450 m/s! In reality the air would most likely become choked at the oriface and reduce this value, but at the immediate start before the cabin air pressure decreases it should roughly still apply. Where P=101325 Pa and p=1.2 kg/m^3,

101325=(1/2)(1.2)v^2
v=449.76 m/s I believe.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Back
Top