Wireless Frequencies: Red Light Frequency Visible?

AI Thread Summary
Creating a wireless signal at the frequency of red light (approximately 430 THz) would not result in visible red light unless the appropriate type of antenna is used. Standard antennas, like those found in cell phones, are not suitable for such high frequencies due to their narrow range and physical size limitations. Instead, specialized antennas or devices, such as lasers or diodes, are necessary to transmit and receive signals effectively at these frequencies. The discussion highlights the challenges of coupling to antennas at optical wavelengths and the importance of considering quantum mechanical effects at such scales. Understanding these concepts requires a solid foundation in electromagnetic theory, which the participants acknowledge as a gap in their knowledge.
Goalie_Ca
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
Okay, this may sound like a dumb question, but if i were to create a wireless signal with a frequency of red light for example, how come i would not see red light... or would i? Is this a difference caused by real and virtual photons?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Creating red light IS creating a wireless signal with a frequency that of red light.
 
I guess what i mean to say is that if i had an antenna and i kicked the frequency up to 430 THz (somehow) would i see red light?
 
Goalie_Ca said:
I guess what i mean to say is that if i had an antenna and i kicked the frequency up to 430 THz (somehow) would i see red light?
Yes.

What type of antenna do you think you'd need?
 
If you loosen your definition of "antenna" ...
 
turin said:
If you loosen your definition of "antenna" ...
Right - a light bulb is, in a loose sense, an antenna transmitting at a wide frequency range.

edit: light bulb isn't a great analogy - laser is better. And lasers are even used for wired and wireless communications.
 
Last edited:
err, so what i meant by antenna is like a standard antenna! The type a cell phone or 802.11g card has.
 
Goalie_Ca said:
err, so what i meant by antenna is like a standard antenna! The type a cell phone or 802.11g card has.
In that case, no. An antenna like that has a fairly narrow range of frequencies it can transmit/receive in due to the physical size of the antenna and construction of the transmitter.
 
If you would like to consider the infrared rather than optical, and consider highly directional paths rather than sectors (though even mobile/wireless technology is moving strongly to beams, to increase frequency re-use), then free-space optics may be what you're interested in. The idea? Think optical fibre, without the fibre. :smile:

The 'antennae' look rather different than what's on a mobile handset. :eek:
 
  • #10
Okay, can it not transmit / receive because of capacitances in the antenna making it act as a filter?
 
  • #11
Think about how large a half-wave dipole would need to be for even red light (L = 400 nm at the longest). Then, how would you couple to your antenna? The thinnest wires I've ever seen would have a diameter on the order of the length of your antenna, and at those frequencies, you can't afford the random surface current effects that this would cause. And related to this issue, the dipole would need to be so thin that QM effects would dominate any of the CM effects that you would be trying to achieve. You're best bet is to use a diode. This is even done often all the way down to the microwave frequencies (Gunn diodes in horn antennas).
 
  • #12
I think i get what you're getting at.

My EM knowledge is, to put it bluntly, very weak. Sadly, i have to wait a while, due to the course offering schedules and my own, to take the two other courses in it that i plan on taking.
 
Back
Top