Wondering about the signs or coordinate system for forces?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the signs of forces in two different situations involving a coordinate system. In Situation 2, the user identifies the forces acting on three masses, suggesting that gravitational forces (Fg) are negative and tensions (T) are positive. The importance of maintaining a consistent coordinate system is emphasized, with a recommendation to use "up=+" and "right=+" for clarity. For inclined plane problems, it's noted that components of forces need to be analyzed without changing the coordinate system. The conversation highlights the necessity of correctly assigning signs to forces to ensure accurate calculations in physics problems.
page123
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What are the signs of the forces (positive + or negative -) acting on both situations?

Situation 1:

zOnbP.png


Situation 2:

xUvzG.png

Homework Equations


Not really necessary

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure about Situation 1 at all, but I think I got Situation 2:

If I have this coordinate system:

SCg5B.png


On m1:
Fg1 = -
T = +

On m2:
Fg2 = -
T = +

On m3:

Fg3 = -
T = +

Is that right? Now how would I go about doing Situation 1? Would I have to employ a rotated coordinate system like:

fWh7C.png


Can anyone list the forces like that?

EDIT: By the way, this is so that I can implement them properly in my equations. For example, Fnet for m1 would then be T - Fg1 instead of T + Fg1. Or is there a better way of doing that instead of using coordinate systems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use any co-ordinate system you want so long as you use it consistently. Directions for + and - is just a convention.

I would stick with the up=+ right=+. To do the inclined plane problem, you have to find the components of force horizontal to and perpendicular to the plane. But that does not require changing the co-ordinate system.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
You can use any co-ordinate system you want so long as you use it consistently. Directions for + and - is just a convention.

I would stick with the up=+ right=+. To do the inclined plane problem, you have to find the components of force horizontal to and perpendicular to the plane. But that does not require changing the co-ordinate system.

AM

Interesting, so what would the signs be for all the forces on that inclined problem, if there were two tensions and the normal force of gravities?
 
page123 said:
Interesting, so what would the signs be for all the forces on that inclined problem, if there were two tensions and the normal force of gravities?
You have to work that out.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
You have to work that out.

AM

Are you sure about keeping the coordinate system consistent? Because on one pulley system where the mass is greater than the other one I saw T - Fg1 and Fg2 - T for each Fnet. If you had a consistent coordinate system the Ts would both be positive and the Fgs would both be negative. So: T - Fg1 and T - Fg2, but that wouldn't get the right answer?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top