Work and Energy-Combining equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Petrucciowns
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving work and energy, specifically how to combine equations related to power, work, and force in the context of lifting an object. The original poster presents a scenario where they need to determine the time required to lift a girder, given specific values for force, distance, and power.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the algebraic manipulation of the equations P=W/t and W=Fs, questioning how to correctly derive t=Fs/P. There are discussions about the correct interpretation of these equations and the steps involved in rearranging them.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing algebraic insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some participants express uncertainty about their algebra skills, while others offer guidance on substituting values and rearranging equations. There is no explicit consensus, but various interpretations and methods are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention a lack of confidence in algebra, which may be affecting their ability to manipulate the equations correctly. There are also references to the need for reviewing fundamental algebraic concepts to better understand the problem.

Petrucciowns
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Work and Energy--Combining equations

Hi, I have the following sample problem that I am having difficulty combining equations:

The power expended in lifting an 825-lb girder to the top of a building 100 ft. high is 10.0 hp. How much time is required to raise the girder.

So the data is:

F= 825
s= 100 ft
P= 10.0
t= ?

Now the following two equations contain all the values we need:

P=W/t and W= Fs

In the text the combined equations are shown as:

t= W/P = Fs/P ----- How was this found and combined?


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, combining the equations is just minor league algebra. P=W/t is the same as saying t=W/P, right? Then put W=Fs. Is that really what your question is? To really finish the problem you need to look up what a horsepower is in ft*lb/s.
 


Well, woudn't P=W/t translate to: t=PxW and where does Fs/P come from?
 


How would P=W/t turn into t=P*W?? Take P=W/t, and multiply both sides by t, getting P*t=(W/t)*t=W. Now divide both sides by P, getting (P*t)/P=t=W/P. You have a wrong idea about algebra. What is it?
 
Last edited:


I see, yeah it has never been my strong point, but how is FS/P found?
 


Take t=W/P. You know W=Fs. Just substitute Fs for W. You can always substitute equal quantities for equal quantities. You aren't exaggerating about algebra being a weak point. No offense, but it's REALLY weak. Problems like this are going to take more than you've got. Can you take some time to review and practice?
 


W = Fs

EDIT: Nevermind. Somebody got there before me.
 


Yeah, I know they are and it hasn't bothered me until now. Ok, so because they are equal quantities it becomes just FS. Where does the P come from if it wasn't previously in the equation.
 


Petrucciowns said:
Yeah, I know they are and it hasn't bothered me until now. Ok, so because they are equal quantities it becomes just FS. Where does the P come from if it wasn't previously in the equation.

What? The P was in the equation previously!

t = W/P [1]

W = Fs [2]

THEREFORE SUBSTITUTING Fs for W in [1],

t = Fs/P
 
  • #10


It was previously in the equation. You see the P in t=W/P? It's that P.
 
  • #11


Got it. Thanks, both of you very much. I haven't had to use algebra in so long, and I was never really good at it. I will do some practicing.

Thanks again.
 
  • #12


Actually I have one more question.

With the values

P= known
s= known
t= known
F= unknown

and the equations P= W/t and W= Fs

how does the working equation become F= Pt/sI was doing it this way F= s * W then after this point I was lost.
 
  • #13


Petrucciowns said:
I was doing it this way F= s * W then after this point I was lost.

Your equation is wrong...
You can look from the previous post that W = F*s , not F = s*W

W = F*s
F = W/s

Do you get it?
 
  • #14


Ok substitute again that W=Fs into P=W/t.
This gets P=Fs/t. Got it? To get F by itself we multiply both sides by t, Pt=Fs, and then you divide by s on both sides. Pt/s=F or F=Pt/s.
 
  • #15


See, that's what I was doing before isolating f by dividing both sides by s ,but

how come P=W/t solving for t = t=W/P when using the above approach multiplying both sides by W gets PxW=t What is the difference with these two problems that makes calculating the answer different?
 
  • #16


Oh sorry! I didn't know the equations were wrong! I just saw two equations and you needed help to get a third one. I don't know the equations or what they mean. Sorry for your trouble.
 
  • #17


Petrucciowns said:
how come P=W/t solving for t = t=W/P when using the above approach multiplying both sides by W gets PxW=t

P =W/t, multiplying both sides by W, we get :

P x W = W^2 / t , not PxW=t
 
  • #18


Petrucciowns said:
Actually I have one more question.

With the values

P= known
s= known
t= known
F= unknown

and the equations P= W/t and W= Fs

how does the working equation become F= Pt/s


I was doing it this way F= s * W then after this point I was lost.

W=F*s does NOT turn into F=s*W when you solve for F. It turns into F=W/s. You have to DIVIDE both sides by s. There's really no point in asking these question until you review your algebra.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K