Work and Rotational Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving a uniform spherical shell and a pulley system. The goal is to determine the speed of a small object after it falls a specified distance, using energy conservation principles. Key equations include the conservation of kinetic and potential energy, specifically relating the gravitational potential energy to the kinetic energy of both the shell and the pulley. The moment of inertia for the spherical shell and the pulley is also considered in the calculations. The problem emphasizes the importance of drawing free body diagrams and applying relevant equations of motion for a comprehensive solution.
peaceandlove
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform spherical shell of mass M = 7.70 kg and radius R = 0.670 m can rotate about a vertical axis on frictionless bearings. A massless cord passes around the equator of the shell, over a pulley of rotational inertia I = 0.0880 kg·m2 and radius r = 0.0790 m, and is attached to a small object of mass m = 2.00 kg. There is no friction on the pulley's axle; the cord does not slip on the pulley. What is the speed of the object when it has fallen a distance 0.610 m after being released from rest? Use energy considerations.


Homework Equations


------


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know where to begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spherical shell is simply a rigid body for which you can find the mass moment of inertia without too much trouble. It and the pulley are both driven by a falling weight with a mass of 2.0 kg.

Draw some FBDs, write the relevant equations of motion and the kinematic relations, and then write down the conservation of kinetic and potential energy for this system.

It is really a simple problem, even though the wording sounds formidable.
 
2mgh=((2/3)M+(I/r^2)+m)v^2

Thank you so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top