Work and Volume in Adiabatic Expansion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final volume and work associated with a reversible adiabatic compression of 1.60 mol of H2 gas. Initial calculations using the ideal gas law and the relationship between pressure and volume yielded incorrect results. Participants emphasized the importance of applying the first law of thermodynamics correctly, noting that for adiabatic processes, energy equals work and should involve differentials. The conversation highlighted the need to derive equations algebraically rather than substituting numerical values prematurely. Ultimately, the focus is on understanding the correct application of thermodynamic principles in adiabatic processes.
ScreamingIntoTheVoid

Homework Statement


A sample of 1.60 mol H2 (Cv = 20.5 J K-1 mol-1) at 21°C and 1.50 atm undergoes a reversible adiabatic compression until the final pressure is 4.50 atm. Calculate the final volume of the gas sample and the work associated with this process. Assume that the gas behaves ideally.

Homework Equations


pv=nRT
p1v1=p2v2
ΔE=-peternalv=nCvΔT

The Attempt at a Solution


pv=nRT → (1.5 atm)(V0=(1.6 mol)(0.08206 atm mol K)(294 K)
V0=25.734016 L (tried this initially as I was given Cv, but that was wrong)
P1V1=P2V2→(1.5 atm)(25.734016 L)=(4.5 atm)(V) →8.57800533 L (which was wrong)

ΔE=-(4.5)(17.1501067)= -77.202 J (nope)
ΔE=(1.6 mol)(20.5 K mol)(294 K)= 9643.2 J (Nope)

I'm not really sure where I went wrong with this, any input would be really helpful
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the process isothermal, or is it adiabatic?
 
Chestermiller said:
Is the process isothermal, or is it adiabatic?
Adiabatic
 
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
Adiabatic
For an adiabatic reversible process, is this equation correct: p1v1=p2v2 ?
 
Chestermiller said:
For an adiabatic reversible process, is this equation correct: p1v1=p2v2 ?
That's what I wrote in my notes at least. I suppose not though?
 
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
That's what I wrote in my notes at least. I suppose not though?
You suppose correctly. Do you know the correct equation? It can be derived by applying the 1st law of thermodynamics to this adiabatic reversible compression. What would the 1st law give you for this?
 
Chestermiller said:
You suppose correctly. Do you know the correct equation? It can be derived by applying the 1st law of thermodynamics to this adiabatic reversible compression. What would the 1st law give you for this?
The first law of thermodynamics would be conservation of energy, which would be Internal Energy=Q+W. Since it's an adiabatic system, Energy would just be equal to work. E=p deltaV and nCv delta T... Right?
 
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
The first law of thermodynamics would be conservation of energy, which would be Internal Energy=Q+W. Since it's an adiabatic system, Energy would just be equal to work. E=p deltaV and nCv delta T... Right?
Yes! Except that, because the process is reversible, those deltas should be d’s. That is, differentials. And there should be a minus sign. Now substitute p=nRT/V into the equation. What does that give you?
 
Do you mean the volume value I calculated before or the actual equation itself?
E= -(4.5 atm) (d/dv 25.734016 L) =...
E= nRT/v x d/dv V -> E= nRT d/dv
(I'm sorry I lost momentum here I'm unsure what to do.)
 
  • #10
What I'm saying is $$nC_vdT=-\frac{nRT}{V}dV$$ Does this equation make sense to you?
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
What I'm saying is $$nC_vdT=-\frac{nRT}{V}dV$$ Does this equation make sense to you?
I thought I did but based on what I came up with it seems I've shamed my calculus teacher

∫nCvdt=-∫nRT/v dV → nCvT1-nCvT2=-(nRT)ln(V1)-(nRTln(V2)
So if I plug what I know
(1.6 mol)(20.5 J K-1 mol-1)(294K) - (1.6 mol)(20.5 J K mol)(T2)=-[(1.6)(8.315)(294)ln(25.734016 L)-(1.6)(8.315)(294)(lnV2)]

-3060.220545=(1.6 mol)(20.5 J K mol)(T) - (319.296)(ln (25.734016 L/ V2)

So I'm assuming this is super wrong?
 
  • #12
This is not integrated correctly. And, please stop substituting numbers. Do it all algebraically.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top