Work (Conservation of Energy/Newton's Laws)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jzwiep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Work
AI Thread Summary
Sam, a 75kg skier, descends a 50m high, 20-degree frictionless slope while facing a 200N headwind. Using work and energy principles, he calculates his speed at the bottom to be approximately 15.73 m/s, while applying Newton's laws yields a lower speed of about 12.23 m/s. The discrepancy arises from an error in calculating the force component of the headwind; it should be 200*cos(20) instead of 200/cos(20). This miscalculation affects the net force and acceleration used in the Newton's laws approach. Correcting this will align both methods and provide a consistent answer.
jzwiep
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


MP 11.44

Sam, whose mass is 75kg, straps on his skis and starts down a 50-m-high, 20degree frictionless slope. A strong headwind exerts a horizontal force of 200N on him as he skies. Find Sam's speed at the bottom (a) using work and evergy (b) Using Newton's laws


Homework Equations



v2=v02 + 2ad

Dot product

The Attempt at a Solution



(a)

U = K + WHeadwind

vf=sqrt(2*(mgh+F*(h/sin20)*cos(160))/m)

Which got me= 15.7270m/s

(b)

Fnet = Fg - Fheadwind
a=(mgsin(20)-200/cos(20))/m

v2=v02 + 2ad
v= sqrt(2ad)

Which got me: 12.225m/s

I'm not sure where I went wrong. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jzwiep said:
Fnet = Fg - Fheadwind
a=(mgsin(20)-200/cos(20))/m
What's the component of the 200N force parallel to the slope?
 
200/cos(20) means that component of force along the slope is greater than the force itself!
You should write 200*cos20. Well, maybe it is just a typing error (like evergy) because you wrote mg*sin20 and not mg/sin20
 
Thanks. I drew the triangle backwards.
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Solving Newton's Second Law: Tension, Work and Kinetic Energy
Replies
10
Views
2K
Sam, Whose mass is 75kg(Work Energy Problem)
Replies
3
Views
4K
What is the speed of Sam at the bottom of the slope?
Replies
11
Views
7K
Problem of spring block system: force vs conservation of energy
Replies
20
Views
3K
Circular motion in the vertical plane
Replies
1
Views
2K
D’Alembert Vs Conservation of Energy
Replies
3
Views
5K
Using conservation of energy vs. Newton's laws in a pulley problem
Replies
7
Views
2K
Given a uniform chain on an incline, find the work done by friction
Replies
8
Views
2K
Conservation of energy derived from Newton's Laws?
Replies
2
Views
9K
Conservation of energy/Finding maximum height
Replies
2
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top