Work Done by a Force: A Breakdown

Thread starter IMGOOD
Start date Jan 20, 2007
Tags

Force Work Work done

AI Thread Summary

Work done by a force is indeed equal to the sum of the work done by its components, as demonstrated through the scalar product of force and displacement. When a force F acts on an object over a displacement d, the total work can be calculated using the formula W = F · d, which incorporates the angle between the force and displacement vectors. For instance, if force F is broken down into its x and y components, the work done by each component can be calculated separately and summed to yield the total work done. This principle holds true in both one and two-dimensional scenarios, confirming that the work done by a force is additive. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing forces in physics.

Jan 20, 2007

IMGOOD

Is a work done by a force equal to the sum of the work done by the its components?

Physics news on Phys.org

Jan 20, 2007

radou

Homework Helper

IMGOOD said:

Is a work done by a force equal to the sum of the work done by the its components?

Try to think of an example to prove/disprove your point. Let a force F be doing some work on a displacement d. Define the work and look at the scalar product.

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

View full post »

Thread 'I've come across another fluid pressure problem I don't understand'

Neglect gravity other than that of water; neglect friction. F1=ρgsh=1000*10*1*(1+4)=50000 N; F1=ρgsh=1000*10*0.1*4=4000 N; F3=50000-4000=46000 N?

View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

View full post »