Work Done By A Force of Constant Magnitude in Moving an Object in a Circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a wagon being pulled in a circular path by a constant force at an angle. The initial approach suggests using the equation W=F*d*cos(θ) and finding the circumference to determine work as W=2πrFcos(θ). However, the student questions this conclusion by reasoning that the work should cancel out as the force direction changes around the circle. After exploring line integrals, the student finds that the dot product of the force and displacement is zero, leading to the belief that no work is done. Ultimately, the teacher asserts that the book's answer is correct, emphasizing that the force's direction aligns with the motion, resulting in positive work.
Zach Knight
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wagon is drawn by a student pulling with a constant force of F Newtons applied at an angle of θ° to the horizontal. If the wagon is drawn in a circle with radius r meters, how much work is done on the wagon? (I don't remember the actual numbers)


Homework Equations


W=F*d*cos(θ)
W=\int_{C}\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}

The Attempt at a Solution


The teacher's solution manual proceeded as follows.
First, multiply the magnitude of the force by the cosine of the angle to the horizontal to obtain the force in the direction of motion. Then find the circumference of the circle to find the distance the wagon travels. Finally, find the product of these two quantities to find the work done on the wagon. This yields W=2\pirFcos(θ). I felt uneasy with this answer, though, so I began pondering the question on my own.

I considered the point on the circle where the wagon began and the point directly opposite it. I then imagined the wagon moved a small distance along the circle counterclockwise from both points. Since the magnitude of the force remains constant, and the displacements are in opposite directions, the work along the two paths should cancel. I continued this process until the whole circle was traversed and concluded that the work done must be zero.

I explained this line of reasoning to my teacher, but he denied its validity. I too was a bit uncertain because of its lack of rigor, so I approached the problem using line integrals.
I began by writing the displacement and force as functions of time. This yielded \vec{r}=r\cdot cos(\omega t)\hat{i}+r\cdot sin(\omega t)\hat{j} and \vec{F}=F\cdot cos(\theta)\cdot cos(\omega t)\hat{i}+F\cdot cos(\theta)\cdot sin(\omega t)\hat{j}, where \omega is the angular speed of the wagon. I then found the dot product of \vec{F} and \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}, which was zero. The integral of this w.r.t. time from 0 to \frac{360}{\omega} was also zero.

I showed this to my teacher, but he doesn't know calculus; he just denied my argument again. Is the book correct, or am I?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnitude of the force may remain constant, but its direction changes all around the circle. In fact, it always points in the instantaneous direction of the motion. So there can be no cancellation -- the work is always positive when the force is in the same direction as the motion. The book is correct.
 
Okay. I think I see where I went wrong with the line integral approach too. Because the force is applied perpendicular to the motion, \vec{F} should equal -F\cdot cos(\theta) \cdot sin(\omega t)\hat{i}+F\cdot cos(\theta) \cdot cos(\omega t)\hat{j}.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top