Work done by moving a point charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done in moving a point charge within an equilateral triangle formed by three identical charges. The potential difference (VAB) is derived from the work done in moving a unit charge, leading to a calculated answer of 72 mJ. There is some confusion regarding whether the moving charge contributes to the potential, but it's clarified that a charge does not exert a force on itself. The suggestion is made to use potential energy differences for clarity in understanding the problem. Ultimately, the participant gains confidence in their understanding and is encouraged to practice further.
Jake 7174
Messages
80
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


[/B]
Three point charges each of 4 µC are situated at the three corners of an equilateral triangle of side 4 m. Find the work done in moving one of them to a point mid-way between the other two.

Solution: The Potential difference VAB between two points A and B is the work done in moving a unit positive charge from A to B. The work done in moving a test charge q from A to B is WAB = qVAB. First let us assume that the side of the triangle is a and later we can substitute a number for it.

VAB = 2 * [q / (4πε0) * (2/a −1/a)] = 2q / (4πε0a) = 72 / s kV

Homework Equations



V = q / (4πε0r)

W = qVAB

The Attempt at a Solution



I have the solution part of it is shown above. The answer is 72 mJ. I think I understand it but am having trouble convincing myself with regaurds to portion of the solution shown above. I need some conceptual assistance. Here is what I am seeing. Let's make an equilateral triangle with a charge q1 at the origin, q2 at (4,0), and q3 at (2,2sqrt(3))

I believe VA at q3 = 2 * q / (4πε0a) where a is the radius (defined in the solution)

I believe VB at (2,0) when moving q3 down = 2 * q / (4πε0(a/2)) = q / (πε0a)

Then VAB = VB - VA = q / (πε0a) - 2 * q / (4πε0a) = 2q / (4πε0a)

This is the solution I am looking for but I want to make sure my reasoning is sound. My equation is equivalent to but is not set up like the one in the solution. The way the solution shows it in step 1 seems like an odd way to express it.

I am also having trouble convincing myself of this result because q3 is a point charge and not just some test point. I want ta say that there must be a voltage created by q3 and that my math has neglected to account for it.

Any help is greatly appreciated. It is exam day tomorrow and I don't want to blow it on lack of conceptual understanding.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure the answer is 72mJ?
 
CrazyNinja said:
Are you sure the answer is 72mJ?
If it is not; then the solution given by my professor is incorrect. VAB ends up being 18 kV according to the solution.

W = qVAB = 4*10^(-6) * 18000 = .072 J

Is this not correct?
 
Last edited:
Okay the answer is correct. I made a small mistake. Now, what is your doubt?
 
CrazyNinja said:
Okay the answer is correct. I made a small mistake. Now, what is your doubt?
It is the setting up of the equation for VAB. Is the method I used to find it good or did I get lucky? I essentially treated a charge as a test charge to find VA and VB, but shouldn't this charge contribute to V as well. After all it has charge equal to the other two.

The math works out so I know I am a bit mixed up conceptually. I trust the numbers more than myself.
 
Jake 7174 said:
I essentially treated a charge as a test charge to find VA and VB, but shouldn't this charge contribute to V as well.
A charge does not contribute to the field which acts on it. Clearly speaking, it does not exert a force on itself. Hence, there is no potential assosciated with itself.

To avoid confusion, do it by using potential energy instead of setting up the potential as you did. Try it and tell me if you feel comfortable that way. If not, we will try another alternative. Take initial potential energy, final potential energy and get the difference.
 
CrazyNinja said:
A charge does not contribute to the field which acts on it. Clearly speaking, it does not exert a force on itself. Hence, there is no potential assosciated with itself.

To avoid confusion, do it by using potential energy instead of setting up the potential as you did. Try it and tell me if you feel comfortable that way. If not, we will try another alternative. Take initial potential energy, final potential energy and get the difference.

I think I am good. I feel confident. Thank you
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja
Write the exam well. Try a few more problems like this using the potential energy method. Get the theory right, the questions will automatically get answered.
 
Back
Top