Work Done by Spring at A: Calculating from Position 2 to Position 3

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a torsion spring as a uniform bar rotates from position 2 to position 3. The correct approach involves integrating the counterclockwise couple function, C(θ) = -10θ, with appropriate limits of integration based on the equilibrium position. The initial calculation yielded -3.8 N·m, but the correct answer is -8.38 N·m, highlighting the importance of accurately setting integration limits relative to the equilibrium position. Participants emphasize the need to consider equilibrium conditions in solving such problems. Overall, understanding the relationship between positions and equilibrium is crucial for accurate calculations.
maniac90
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The torsion spring at A applies the counterclockwise couple C(θ)= − 10θ N · m to the uniform bar.The angle θ (in radians) is measured counterclockwise
from position 1, where the spring is undeformed.

Calculate the work done by the spring on the bar as it rotates from position 2 to position 3.

http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/1696/182z.jpg


Homework Equations



U1-2 = ∫C dθ

U1-2 = C(θ2 − θ1)= C Δθ

The Attempt at a Solution



U1-2 = ∫− 10θ dθ = -10∫θ dθ

= -10 (1/2) θ2

50° = 5π/18 rad

U1-2 = -3.8

I am not sure if that is the correct way of solving it, any guidance would be helpful
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me.
 
I just checked the book. The answer says it is −8.38 N·m
I can't figure out what I am doing wrong
 
Oh, here's the issue. Sorry I didn't check more closely before. I think your limits of integration were off. It should be

W = \int^{\theta = 4\pi/9}_{\theta = \pi/6} -10\theta d\theta

because the equilibrium position of the system is at position 1, where \theta = 0. You want to find the work done by the spring moving from position 2 (\theta = \frac{\pi}{6}, relative to position 1) to position 3 (\theta = \frac{4\pi}{9}, with respect to position 1).
 
So the moral of the story is that it's highly important to take into account your equilibrium conditions and how the interactions occur relative to the equilibrium conditions. It's also important for people who answer questions on PF not to get ahead of themselves and forget (like I did here) to check that the approach the OP takes is duly considerate of the equilibrium conditions and their relation to the conditions stated as the bounds of the problem.
 
That helped me a lot. Thank you very much
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top