Work done in an accelerating frame.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the man's rate of energy expenditure while climbing a ladder in an accelerating elevator. The apparent weight of the man is adjusted to account for the elevator's acceleration, leading to a force he must exert. The confusion arises from differing power calculations based on the reference frame, with the correct power output being w*(V+v) rather than just w*v. It is clarified that energy calculations differ between an inertial frame and a non-inertial frame, affecting the perceived power output. Ultimately, the energy values are not directly comparable across different frames of reference.
theloathedone
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A man of weight W is in an elevator. The elevator accelerates vertically up at a rate a and at a certain instant has a speed V. The man then climbs a vertical ladder within the elevator at a speed v relative to the elevator. What is the man's rate of expenditure of energy?


Homework Equations


P = Fv


The Attempt at a Solution


So first, I found the apparent weight of the man as
w=W(1+\frac{a}{g})
which would be the force that he needs to exert in order to continue climbing.
I thought that the power required is just w*v (small v, the speed at which he is climbing in the elevator). But the answer states that it's w*(V+v), the total speed.

I was thinking that the power output should be the same whether the elevator just started to move and when it has already been accelerating for a certain time. So I'm not sure if the answer is wrong, or I've made a conceptual mistake.

Thanks in advance for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you'll get different answers if you treat the elevator as a gravitational system with gravity (a+g), versus treating the man as having speed (v+V) and acceleration (a).

I'd guess that the energy construct is only valid in an inertial frame and takes on a different meaning when changing the gravity. I hope this helps you with your question.
 
Sorry, I should have been more accurate. Energy is valid if one works in an inertial system, but an accelerating system, if treated as a different inertial system, will give different results.
 
So to clarify, the power output depends on the frame of reference?

In a frame of reference inside the elevator, the rate of expenditure of energy should still be
W(1+\frac{a}{g})(v)
right? Since the man he has to exert a force of W(1+\frac{a}{g}) and is traveling at speed v. But from an observer who is stationary on the earth, the power is different.
 
To clarify, in the elevator frame, his energy is given by:

E_man = E_potential + E_kinetic
= m(a+g)h_elevator + (1/2)mv^2

From the ground, his energy is given by:

E_man = E_potential + E_kinetic
= mg(h_ground + h_elevator) + (1/2)m(v+V)^2

These energy values are not commensurate, so calculating the power will give different answers.
 
Ok I get it now :)

Thanks vertigo!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top