Work done on a rigid body in a collision

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the work-kinetic energy theorem in the context of a rigid ball colliding elastically with a wall. Participants explore the implications of the collision, particularly focusing on the behavior of kinetic energy and the nature of forces involved during the collision process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how to apply the work-kinetic energy theorem given that the contact point between the ball and wall does not move during the collision.
  • There is a suggestion that the ball must compress during the collision, which raises questions about treating the ball as a rigid body.
  • One participant argues that no real work is done by the external force since the wall remains stationary, implying that energy changes are internal to the ball.
  • Another participant seeks to understand the "domain of validity" of the work-kinetic energy theorem and whether a generalization exists if the theorem cannot be applied.
  • There is a discussion about the conservation of linear momentum, with some participants noting that the total momentum of the system (ball and wall) is conserved if considered as an isolated system.
  • Participants explore different modeling approaches, suggesting that the definition of "the system" can affect the analysis of forces and energy changes.
  • One participant introduces a model involving point particles and internal forces, questioning how the total kinetic energy of the system changes during the collision.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of the work-kinetic energy theorem and whether it can be generalized. There is no consensus on the correct approach to analyze the collision, with multiple competing views on the nature of forces and energy changes involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption of rigid body behavior, the dependence on the definition of the system, and the unresolved nature of energy dissipation in real collisions versus idealized models.

  • #31
Doc Al said:
It applies wherever Newton's laws hold, which I would not describe as having limited utility.
It's a useful theorem, but different than conservation of energy.
I'm not talking about conservation of energy. I'm talking about a version of a work-kinetic energy theorem (if it exists in enlish language) which is valid for systems of particles and, as a special case of this, for rigid bodies (that is a system of particles where the mutual distances between them is constant, so the work done by internal forces is zero).

So it's easy to prove (matt helped me in this) that, for a rigid body, the total work done by the external forces is equal to the kinetic energy variation of the body. Here "work" means "real work" and "kinetic energy" means "total kinetic energy" so even rotational kinetic energy.

For example In italian language is called "Teorema delle forze vive" or "Teorema dell'energia cinetica" for systems of particles or for rigid bodies as a special case; maybe in english language it has a different name than "work-kinetic energy theorem".

--
lightarrow
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
lightarrow said:
I'm not talking about conservation of energy. I'm talking about a version of a work-kinetic energy theorem (if it exists in enlish language) which is valid for systems of particles and, as a special case of this, for rigid bodies (that is a system of particles where the mutual distances between them is constant, so the work done by internal forces is zero).
The theorem I described, which is usually called the work-energy theorem, is valid for systems of particles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K