Work done on the Earth by the Sun

AI Thread Summary
The work done on the Earth by the Sun is considered zero over a complete orbit due to the conservative nature of gravitational forces, which are path-independent. While the Earth's speed varies along its elliptical path, resulting in positive work when kinetic energy increases and negative work when it decreases, the net work over a closed orbit remains zero. However, in reality, the Earth experiences gravitational interactions with other celestial bodies, making its path not perfectly closed. These interactions and dissipative forces affect the average net work done on the Earth over time. Overall, while the theoretical model suggests zero net work, real-world complexities introduce variations in energy dynamics.
nothing123
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Homework Statement



I was just wondering, because the Earth follows an elliptical path around the sun and the gravitational force of the sun on the Earth is towards the sun, would the work done on the Earth be considered positive or negative?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because of the ellipticity, the speed of the Earth varies. When the KE of the Earth increases, work done on Earth is positive and vice versa. During a complete orbit however, the total work done is zero.
 
Quick answer:

The gravitational force is conservative, which implies that the work done by such a force on an object passing from A to B is path-independent. In the model where the Sun alone acts on the Earth, the fact that the Earth completes a closed orbit automatically implies that the net work done on it by the Sun is zero. (Indeed, any closed curve would lead to this conclusion.)

Complicating features:

In reality, the Earth is subject to gravitational interactions with every other massive object in the Solar System (and, to a far lesser extent, the rest of the Cosmos), so its path is in fact not closed. In the long run, the average net work on the Earth (or any of the other bodies) is not zero. There are also dissipative forces at (very slow) work on all the bodies, so the total mechanical energy is not actually conserved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top