Work & Energy: Definition and History

AI Thread Summary
The term "work" in physics was defined by Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis in the 1820s, emphasizing its importance in understanding physical phenomena. The definition of work is crucial for analyzing energy transfer and mechanical systems, making it easier to comprehend natural processes. The work-energy theorem and the principle of conservation of energy emerged as foundational concepts in physics, allowing for deeper insights into mechanical interactions. Historical approaches to these concepts have evolved, reflecting advancements in scientific understanding. Overall, the definition of work serves as a key framework for studying energy dynamics in various physical contexts.
muzz
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
why work is defined? and when it was defined ( approximately) and who has defined it? It is one of the most important things in physics and I am wondering that is it defined only for make the seeing and understanding things in the nature easier?

Actually I am also wondering about when and how did people approach mechanical or any physical things through conservation of energy or work-energy theorem.

Everybody knows;such as, F=ma or orher laws details, but I ve never heard any historical things about energy, work, conservation, etc.

Thank you all in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The term "work" was apparently coined by Coriolis in the 1820s.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Why does the main muscle use the most energy in body movements?
Replies
24
Views
2K
Is conservation of energy derived from the work energy theorem?
2
Replies
65
Views
5K
B The work done by two objects on each other
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
Gravitational potential energy -- Why is it always negative?
Replies
10
Views
3K
Definition of potential energy
Replies
13
Views
1K
Regarding the idea of potential energy
Replies
2
Views
1K
Conservative forces, Nonconservative forces and Potential Energy
Replies
9
Views
3K
Can we say that work done can be used only for mechanical energy?
Replies
14
Views
1K
I Work Done/Energy Transferred in One Dimensional Collision
Replies
5
Views
2K
Work Done: Understanding the Definition and Maths
Replies
19
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top