Work & Momentum: T, F, r, sinθ

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for torque, T = F•r•sinθ, and its unit of measurement, Newton-meters (N•m). Participants question how to solve for distance when r is between 0 and 1, and why torque is represented in Newtons despite having units of (kg•m)/(s^2)•m. It is noted that both torque and work share the same dimensional units because they both result from the product of force and distance. The relationship between torque and work is clarified, emphasizing that one Newton-meter of torque applied over one radian of rotation yields consistent units. Understanding these concepts is crucial for correctly applying the formula in various contexts.
Anas
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
#1 As my teacher explained "T=F•r•sin<" all clear so far.
When i attempted to apply the formula it crossed my mind that the unit of T is (N•m), if so how do we solve for distence 0< r < 1.
#2 Another question if the unit is {(kg•m)/(s^2)}•m why did he represent moment with Newtons?
Assuming that he follows a rule of equivalency from tork to Newtons, how is it the same value on two different units?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anas said:
Hello,
#1 As my teacher explained "T=F•r•sin<" all clear so far.
When i attempted to apply the formula it crossed my mind that the unit of T is (N•m), if so how do we solve for distence 0< r < 1.
#2 Another question if the unit is {(kg•m)/(s^2)}•m why did he represent moment with Newtons?
Assuming that he follows a rule of equivalency from tork to Newtons, how is it the same value on two different units?
Hmm, you will need to tell us the context of this formula. As it stands, it could be to do with many different situations.
 
Anas said:
Assuming that he follows a rule of equivalency from tork to Newtons, how is it the same value on two different units?
It is difficult to understand what you are asking. My guess is that you are wondering why the unit for torque has the same dimensions as the unit for energy, both having dimensions of mass times distance squared over time squared.

One answer is that both are the product of a force times a distance. Another is that one Newton-meter of work is just what you would expect when applying one Newton-meter of torque over one radian of rotation. Since the radian is dimensionless, the units for torque and work will have the same dimensions.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top