Work to Bring Object up Mineshaft to Earth Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter sean80439
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work needed to bring an object of mass m from the center of the Earth to the surface, one must integrate the gravitational force, which varies with radius, using the equation g(r) = -GMr/R^3. The derived solution of -GM/2R appears incorrect, as the force acting on the object changes based on the mass of the Earth enclosed within its radius. When considering an object dropped into a mineshaft, its speed at the center can be determined by recognizing that the net force is zero at the center and that the force is linear with distance from the center. The work done can be expressed as W = ∫Fr δr, integrating from 0 to R, and the gravitational relationship shifts from linear inside the sphere to an inverse square law outside. Understanding that only the mass of the Earth within the radius contributes to the gravitational force is crucial for accurate calculations.
sean80439
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Here is the first part of the question:
If there is an object of mass m at the center of the earth, how much work does it take bring that object up a shaft to the surface? Edit: Earth is uniform density.

Do I integrate g(r) = -GMr/R^3 with respect to 'r' to get the change in gravity from the center of the Earth to the surface and then solve from R-0. If so I get a solution of -GM/2R, and that doesn't look at all right to me.

The second half of the question relates back to the first part and asks if mass m is dropped from the surface down a mineshaft to the center of the earth, what will its speed be when it reaches the center. Again, since gravity is changing with respect to the radius, how do I get a solid answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the force at the center? Half-way to the surface?

Use the fact that the mass of the shell outside the radius from the object to the center does not exert a net force.

Can you get a general force equation from these (for objects within the radius of the Earth)? Now how can you get work knowing the force?
 
The net force would be zero at the center. Halfway it would be F=-GMm/2R^2 (r = R/2). It would be the F Normal = mg(r) wouldn't it, with W = mg(r)R? Why does it matter what the force is halfway to the surface or am I missing something?
 
Well the point is to see that the force is linear with distance as it increases from the center. From that you can integrate and find the work done.

Notice that the entire mass is not acting on the object when it is at the halfway point. In fact, the mass that is acting on it is the mass of the Earth enclosed by a sphere of radius equal to the distance of the object from the center. Does that make sense? Your current expression for the second bit is incorrect for this reason.
 
Last edited:
So the equation should look like: W = ∫Fr δr or
W = ∫GMmr/R^3 δr and evaluate from 0 to R correct?

Also as I understand it, the relationship is linear inside the sphere and changes to the inverse square when outside correct? When you say second expression are you referring to the original integral in the initial post?

Last edit: Yes I think I know what you mean, the only mass acting on the object is the mass of the Earth at that radius ignoring all mass from every radius of r > r_object.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top